DLO vs. FVRR
DLO (DLocal Limited) and FVRR (Fiverr International Ltd.) are both stocks. DLO operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while FVRR operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, DLO returned -18.65%/yr vs -48.60%/yr for FVRR. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
DLO vs. FVRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DLO achieves a 8.44% return, which is significantly higher than FVRR's -54.81% return.
DLO
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- 6M
- 13.92%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 1Y
- 49.45%
- 3Y*
- 2.15%
- 5Y*
- -18.65%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -11.95%
FVRR
- 1D
- -2.72%
- 1M
- -18.15%
- 6M
- -46.69%
- YTD
- -54.81%
- 1Y
- -59.56%
- 3Y*
- -32.86%
- 5Y*
- -48.60%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -13.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $26.36M | $30.89M | $35.54M | |
| $11.18M | $8.33M | $8.87M |
DLO vs. FVRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLO DLocal Limited | 8.44% | 31.72% | -36.35% | 13.62% | -56.37% | 15.13% |
FVRR Fiverr International Ltd. | -54.81% | -37.72% | 16.57% | -6.59% | -74.37% | -45.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between DLO and FVRR is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2021 | 0.43 |
The correlation between DLO and FVRR shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
DLO:
$4.43B
FVRR:
$321.04M
DLO:
$0.64
FVRR:
$0.82
DLO:
23.53
FVRR:
10.93
DLO:
0.73
FVRR:
0.05
DLO:
3.73
FVRR:
0.78
DLO:
8.17
FVRR:
0.75
DLO:
$1.21B
FVRR:
$418.35M
DLO:
$436.56M
FVRR:
$343.03M
DLO:
$280.42M
FVRR:
$67.55M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DLO vs. FVRR — Risk / Return Rank
DLO
FVRR
DLO vs. FVRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DLocal Limited (DLO) and Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DLO | FVRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.78 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | -0.90 | +2.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.25 | -1.36 | +4.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DLO vs. FVRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DLO drawdown since its inception was -89.99%, smaller than the maximum FVRR drawdown of -97.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLO and FVRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DLO | FVRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.99% | -97.24% | +7.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.45% | -66.52% | +36.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.59% | -74.81% | +6.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.99% | -96.18% | +6.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.69% | -97.24% | +20.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.38% | -68.21% | -2.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.28% | 43.69% | -28.41% |
Volatility
DLO vs. FVRR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DLocal Limited (DLO) is 9.91%, while Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) has a volatility of 26.74%. This indicates that DLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FVRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DLO | FVRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.91% | 26.74% | -16.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.59% | 47.39% | -11.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.97% | 54.13% | +1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.90% | 64.83% | +8.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.17% | 71.15% | +2.02% |
Dividends
DLO vs. FVRR - Dividend Comparison
DLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, while FVRR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DLO DLocal Limited | 1.29% | 3.71% |
FVRR Fiverr International Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
DLO vs. FVRR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between DLocal Limited and Fiverr International Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DLO vs. FVRR - Profitability Comparison
DLO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, DLocal Limited reported a gross profit of 118.68M and revenue of 335.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.3%.
FVRR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported a gross profit of 79.93M and revenue of 97.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.7%.
DLO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, DLocal Limited reported an operating income of 53.55M and revenue of 335.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.9%.
FVRR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported an operating income of 4.38M and revenue of 97.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.
DLO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, DLocal Limited reported a net income of 41.98M and revenue of 335.86M, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
FVRR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported a net income of 4.47M and revenue of 97.78M, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DLO and FVRR have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FVRR has higher volatility (26.74%) compared to DLO (9.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLO dropped -89.99% vs FVRR's -97.24%.
DLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DLO and FVRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer