DLO vs. CLS
DLO (DLocal Limited) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — DLO in Software - Infrastructure, CLS in Electronic Components. Over the past 5 years, DLO returned -21.99%/yr vs 117.18%/yr for CLS. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DLO vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DLO achieves a -12.20% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's 27.48% return.
DLO
- 1D
- -4.53%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- -12.20%
- 6M
- -13.54%
- 1Y
- 21.72%
- 3Y*
- 2.37%
- 5Y*
- -21.99%
- 10Y*
- —
CLS
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 2.58%
- YTD
- 27.48%
- 6M
- 22.81%
- 1Y
- 178.67%
- 3Y*
- 198.00%
- 5Y*
- 117.18%
- 10Y*
- 44.15%
DLO vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLO DLocal Limited | -12.20% | 31.72% | -36.35% | 13.62% | -56.37% | 15.13% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 27.48% | 220.27% | 215.23% | 159.80% | 1.26% | 32.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between DLO and CLS is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2021 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
DLO:
$3.66B
CLS:
$43.60B
DLO:
$0.64
CLS:
$8.28
DLO:
19.15
CLS:
45.49
DLO:
0.60
CLS:
0.61
DLO:
3.03
CLS:
3.16
DLO:
6.62
CLS:
20.78
DLO:
$1.21B
CLS:
$13.81B
DLO:
$436.56M
CLS:
$1.60B
DLO:
$280.42M
CLS:
$1.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DLO vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank
DLO
CLS
DLO vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DLocal Limited (DLO) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DLO | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.35 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 6.15 | -5.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.44 | 14.62 | -13.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DLO vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DLO drawdown since its inception was -89.99%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLO and CLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DLO | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.99% | -96.93% | +6.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.45% | -29.24% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.59% | -53.96% | -14.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.99% | -53.96% | -36.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.13% | -20.23% | -60.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.22% | -73.28% | +3.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.07% | 12.28% | +2.79% |
Volatility
DLO vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DLocal Limited (DLO) is 12.17%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 26.96%. This indicates that DLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DLO | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.17% | 26.96% | -14.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.71% | 53.59% | -19.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.28% | 72.82% | -17.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.63% | 57.76% | +15.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.61% | 50.03% | +23.58% |
Dividends
DLO vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
DLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CLS Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DLO DLocal Limited | 1.59% | 3.71% |
Financials
DLO vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between DLocal Limited and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DLO vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison
DLO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DLocal Limited reported a gross profit of 118.68M and revenue of 335.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.3%.
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
DLO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DLocal Limited reported an operating income of 53.55M and revenue of 335.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.9%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
DLO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DLocal Limited reported a net income of 41.98M and revenue of 335.86M, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DLO and CLS have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLS has higher volatility (26.96%) compared to DLO (12.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLO dropped -89.99% vs CLS's -96.93%.
CLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DLO and CLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer