DLO vs. CLS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about DLocal Limited (DLO) and Celestica Inc. (CLS).

Performance

DLO vs. CLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DLocal Limited (DLO) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DLO vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DLO DLocal Limited	-12.02%	31.72%	-36.35%	13.62%	-56.37%	10.19%
CLS Celestica Inc.	-2.33%	220.27%	215.23%	159.80%	1.26%	32.19%

Fundamentals

Market Cap DLO : $3.67B CLS : $33.46B
EPS DLO : $0.65 CLS : $7.19
PE Ratio DLO : 19.08 CLS : 40.14
PEG Ratio DLO : 0.59 CLS : 0.55
PS Ratio DLO : 3.43 CLS : 2.70
PB Ratio DLO : 6.45 CLS : 15.13
Total Revenue (TTM) DLO : $1.09B CLS : $12.41B
Gross Profit (TTM) DLO : $402.76M CLS : $1.44B
EBITDA (TTM) DLO : $273.04M CLS : $1.21B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLO achieves a -12.02% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's -2.33% return.

DLO

• 1D: -4.09%
• 1M: -0.80%
• YTD: -12.02%
• 6M: -11.52%
• 1Y: 51.55%
• 3Y*: -7.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLS

• 1D: 2.50%
• 1M: 8.15%
• YTD: -2.33%
• 6M: 14.72%
• 1Y: 265.20%
• 3Y*: 181.82%
• 5Y*: 101.42%
• 10Y*: 38.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

DLO vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLO

DLO Risk / Return Rank: 73
DLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
DLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
DLO Omega Ratio Rank: 69
DLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
DLO Martin Ratio Rank: 75

CLS

CLS Risk / Return Rank: 96
CLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
CLS Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CLS Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLO vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DLocal Limited (DLO) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DLO	CLS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.94	3.72	-2.78
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	3.33	-1.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.44	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.99	9.11	-7.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.66	24.13	-19.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DLO vs. CLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLO Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the CLS Sharpe Ratio of 3.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLO and CLS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DLO	CLS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94	3.72	-2.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.23	0.25	-0.48

Correlation

The correlation between DLO and CLS is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

DLO vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison

DLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
DLO DLocal Limited	4.22%	3.71%
CLS Celestica Inc.	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

DLO vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLO drawdown since its inception was -89.99%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLO and CLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	DLO	CLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.99%	-96.93%	+6.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.36%	-29.24%	+0.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-53.96%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-80.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-81.09%	-18.12%	-62.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-69.80%	-73.79%	+3.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.10%	11.04%	+1.06%

Volatility

DLO vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DLocal Limited (DLO) is 15.93%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 23.56%. This indicates that DLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DLO	CLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.93%	23.56%	-7.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.65%	55.01%	-21.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.28%	71.85%	-16.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	74.60%	55.71%	+18.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	74.60%	48.75%	+25.85%

Financials

DLO vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between DLocal Limited and Celestica Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

DLO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, DLocal Limited reported a gross profit of 115.80M and revenue of 337.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.3%.

CLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 427.57M and revenue of 3.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.

DLO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, DLocal Limited reported an operating income of 62.52M and revenue of 337.89M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.5%.

CLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 325.73M and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.

DLO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, DLocal Limited reported a net income of 55.54M and revenue of 337.89M, resulting in a net margin of 16.4%.

CLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 271.61M and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.