PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLNV vs. JULB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLNV vs. JULB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - November (DLNV) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLNV achieves a 5.52% return, which is significantly lower than JULB's 6.52% return.


DLNV

1D
0.12%
1M
1.83%
YTD
5.52%
6M
6.20%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JULB

1D
0.16%
1M
2.16%
YTD
6.52%
6M
7.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLNV vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DLNV and JULB is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025

0.95

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLNV vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - November (DLNV) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DLNV vs. JULB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DLNVJULBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.03

2.21

-0.17

Drawdowns

DLNV vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLNV drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, smaller than the maximum JULB drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLNV and JULB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLNVJULBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-5.24%

+0.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.66%

-0.87%

+0.21%

Volatility

DLNV vs. JULB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLNVJULBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.20%

6.79%

+0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.20%

6.79%

+0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.20%

6.79%

+0.41%

DLNV vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLNV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

DLNV vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison

Neither DLNV nor JULB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, DLNV and JULB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DLNV.

DLNV and JULB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DLNV and 0.25% for JULB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLNV and JULB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer