PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLN vs. COWZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLN vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLN achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 8.18% return.


DLN

1D
-0.51%
1M
2.93%
YTD
9.93%
6M
9.96%
1Y
22.38%
3Y*
18.35%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
12.68%

COWZ

1D
-0.34%
1M
2.61%
YTD
8.18%
6M
9.03%
1Y
22.23%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLN vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLN
WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF
9.93%15.53%19.66%9.95%-3.78%25.60%4.59%28.91%-5.82%18.22%
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
8.18%8.98%10.64%14.73%0.19%42.57%11.65%23.41%-10.05%20.22%

Correlation

The correlation between DLN and COWZ is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2016

0.84

The correlation between DLN and COWZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DLN vs. COWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DLN
COWZ

Technology

20.1%
16.0%

Financial Services

18.0%

-

Healthcare

12.6%
21.8%

Consumer Defensive

9.3%
10.9%

Energy

8.5%
16.9%

Industrials

7.9%
8.4%

Communication Services

7.8%
10.4%

Utilities

5.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
11.7%

Real Estate

4.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.0%
3.7%

Technology

DLN
20.1%
COWZ
16.0%

Financial Services

DLN
18.0%
COWZ

-

Healthcare

DLN
12.6%
COWZ
21.8%

Consumer Defensive

DLN
9.3%
COWZ
10.9%

Energy

DLN
8.5%
COWZ
16.9%

Industrials

DLN
7.9%
COWZ
8.4%

Communication Services

DLN
7.8%
COWZ
10.4%

Utilities

DLN
5.9%
COWZ

-

Consumer Cyclical

DLN
5.0%
COWZ
11.7%

Real Estate

DLN
4.0%
COWZ

-

Basic Materials

DLN
1.0%
COWZ
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLN vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLN
DLN Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLN Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

COWZ
COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLN vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DLNCOWZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.53

2.02

+0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.64

2.98

+0.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.36

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

4.46

-0.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.59

12.19

+3.39

DLN vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLN Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the COWZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLN and COWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DLNCOWZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

2.02

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

0.60

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.65

-0.12

Drawdowns

DLN vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLN drawdown since its inception was -57.84%, which is greater than COWZ's maximum drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLN and COWZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLNCOWZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.84%

-38.63%

-19.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.10%

-5.00%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.71%

-22.00%

+8.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.26%

-22.00%

+5.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-0.91%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.52%

-4.81%

-2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

1.83%

-0.39%

Volatility

DLN vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) is 2.17%, while Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) has a volatility of 2.56%. This indicates that DLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLNCOWZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.17%

2.56%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.77%

7.12%

-0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.87%

11.13%

-2.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.26%

17.63%

-4.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.16%

19.93%

-3.77%

DLN vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLN has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

DLN vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

DLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than COWZ's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.99%2.19%1.82%1.92%1.96%1.48%2.54%1.96%1.67%1.95%0.13%0.00%
DLN
WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF
1.79%1.90%2.00%2.43%2.53%2.01%2.66%2.51%2.90%2.33%2.64%2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


DLN and COWZ have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COWZ has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to DLN (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLN dropped -57.84% vs COWZ's -38.63%.

On 5-year performance, DLN leads with 12.22% vs 10.57% for COWZ. On fees, DLN is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DLN has performed better with a 12.22% return vs 10.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DLN is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for COWZ.

COWZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.79% for DLN.

DLN is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while COWZ is Mid Cap Value Equities. DLN tracks WisdomTree LargeCap Dividend Index, while COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DLN and 0.49% for COWZ.

DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLN and COWZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer