DLLL vs. QTJL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DLLL (GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. DLLL is passively managed, while QTJL is actively managed. Over the past year, DLLL returned 850.63% vs 20.52% for QTJL. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DLLL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.

Performance

DLLL vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLLL achieves a 757.76% return, which is significantly higher than QTJL's 7.15% return.

DLLL

• 1D: -6.45%
• 1M: 245.92%
• YTD: 757.76%
• 6M: 648.38%
• 1Y: 850.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTJL

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 1.20%
• YTD: 7.15%
• 6M: 7.91%
• 1Y: 20.52%
• 3Y*: 19.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLLL vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF	757.76%	-3.72%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	7.15%	16.56%

Correlation

The correlation between DLLL and QTJL is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025	0.48

DLLL vs. QTJL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DLLL	QTJL
Technology	66.7%	54.2%
Basic Materials	-	1.2%
Communication Services	-	15.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.6%
Energy	-	0.6%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	4.2%
Industrials	-	2.8%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

DLLL vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLLL

DLLL Risk / Return Rank: 95
DLLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
DLLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
DLLL Omega Ratio Rank: 91
DLLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
DLLL Martin Ratio Rank: 95

QTJL

QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 68
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 70
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLLL vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DLLL	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	6.65	2.06	+4.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.81	2.93	+1.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.42	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	15.02	3.08	+11.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	31.34	16.23	+15.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DLLL vs. QTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLLL Sharpe Ratio is 6.65, which is higher than the QTJL Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLLL and QTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DLLL	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.65	2.06	+4.59
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.16	0.52	+2.63

Drawdowns

DLLL vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLLL drawdown since its inception was -68.58%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLLL and QTJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DLLL	QTJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.58%	-33.40%	-35.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.19%	-6.68%	-50.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.86%	-0.01%	-18.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.91%	-7.94%	-17.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.36%	1.27%	+26.09%

Volatility

DLLL vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) has a higher volatility of 69.39% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 0.31%. This indicates that DLLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DLLL	QTJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	69.39%	0.31%	+69.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	102.08%	7.61%	+94.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	129.28%	10.01%	+119.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	130.55%	20.42%	+110.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	130.55%	20.42%	+110.13%

DLLL vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLLL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

DLLL vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither DLLL nor QTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DLLL and QTJL in my portfolio?

DLLL and QTJL have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DLLL or QTJL?

DLLL has higher volatility (69.39%) compared to QTJL (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLLL dropped -68.58% vs QTJL's -33.40%.

Which ETF is better, DLLL or QTJL?

On 1-year performance, DLLL leads with 850.63% vs 20.52% for QTJL. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DLLL or QTJL?

Over the 1-year period, DLLL has performed better with a 850.63% return vs 20.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DLLL or QTJL?

QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DLLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DLLL or QTJL?

DLLL and QTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DLLL and QTJL?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for DLLL and 0.79% for QTJL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DLLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.65 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.