DLFNX vs. DBLTX
Compare and contrast key facts about DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund (DLFNX) and DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX).
DLFNX is managed by DoubleLine. It was launched on Jun 1, 2010. DBLTX is managed by DoubleLine. It was launched on Apr 6, 2010.
Performance
DLFNX vs. DBLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DLFNX vs. DBLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLFNX DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund | -0.88% | 7.28% | 2.77% | 6.18% | -13.08% | -0.50% | 5.25% | 7.82% | -0.27% | 4.41% |
DBLTX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I | -0.20% | 8.05% | 3.08% | 5.34% | -12.56% | 0.24% | 4.13% | 5.81% | 1.76% | 3.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DLFNX achieves a -0.88% return, which is significantly lower than DBLTX's -0.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DLFNX having a 1.84% annualized return and DBLTX not far behind at 1.83%.
DLFNX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -2.44%
- YTD
- -0.88%
- 6M
- 0.14%
- 1Y
- 3.52%
- 3Y*
- 3.88%
- 5Y*
- 0.51%
- 10Y*
- 1.84%
DBLTX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -2.21%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 4.26%
- 5Y*
- 0.83%
- 10Y*
- 1.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DLFNX vs. DBLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DLFNX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than DBLTX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DLFNX vs. DBLTX — Risk / Return Rank
DLFNX
DBLTX
DLFNX vs. DBLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund (DLFNX) and DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DLFNX | DBLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 1.12 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.36 | 1.62 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.20 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 1.84 | -0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | 5.47 | -0.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DLFNX | DBLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 1.12 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.15 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.42 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.92 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between DLFNX and DBLTX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DLFNX vs. DBLTX - Dividend Comparison
DLFNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, less than DBLTX's 4.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLFNX DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund | 4.17% | 4.62% | 4.96% | 4.41% | 3.72% | 2.87% | 2.92% | 3.17% | 3.10% | 2.65% | 2.71% | 3.34% |
DBLTX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I | 4.43% | 4.86% | 5.03% | 4.35% | 3.86% | 3.12% | 3.39% | 3.66% | 3.74% | 3.65% | 3.72% | 4.11% |
Drawdowns
DLFNX vs. DBLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DLFNX drawdown since its inception was -17.33%, which is greater than DBLTX's maximum drawdown of -16.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLFNX and DBLTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DLFNX | DBLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.33% | -16.49% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.86% | -2.88% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.33% | -16.49% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.33% | -16.49% | -0.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.44% | -2.21% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.74% | -2.38% | -0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 0.97% | -0.12% |
Volatility
DLFNX vs. DBLTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund (DLFNX) is 1.56%, while DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX) has a volatility of 1.74%. This indicates that DLFNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DLFNX | DBLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.56% | 1.74% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.36% | 2.64% | -0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.94% | 4.23% | -0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.20% | 5.56% | -0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.27% | 4.38% | -0.11% |