PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLFNX vs. BILDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLFNX vs. BILDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund (DLFNX) and DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLFNX achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than BILDX's 0.42% return.


DLFNX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.66%
6M
-1.04%
YTD
-0.73%
1Y
1.75%
3Y*
4.19%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*
1.52%
ALL TIME*
3.05%

BILDX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.74%
6M
-0.07%
YTD
0.42%
1Y
2.81%
3Y*
5.77%
5Y*
1.39%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DLFNX vs. BILDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLFNX
DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund
-0.73%7.28%2.77%6.18%-13.08%-0.50%5.25%7.82%-0.27%4.41%
BILDX
DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund
0.42%7.59%4.41%8.89%-11.54%0.14%5.48%8.30%0.39%5.66%

Correlation

The correlation between DLFNX and BILDX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.92

The correlation between DLFNX and BILDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLFNX vs. BILDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DLFNX
DLFNX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
DLFNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLFNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLFNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
DLFNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLFNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

BILDX
BILDX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
BILDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BILDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DLFNX vs. BILDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund (DLFNX) and DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DLFNXBILDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.20

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

1.58

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.11

4.74

-2.63

DLFNX vs. BILDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLFNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the BILDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLFNX and BILDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DLFNX vs. BILDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLFNX drawdown since its inception was -17.33%, which is greater than BILDX's maximum drawdown of -15.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLFNX and BILDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLFNXBILDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.33%

-15.68%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.96%

-2.21%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.82%

-3.14%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.33%

-15.60%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.28%

-1.11%

-1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.72%

-2.96%

+0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

0.73%

+0.50%

Volatility

DLFNX vs. BILDX - Volatility Comparison

DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund (DLFNX) has a higher volatility of 1.08% compared to DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) at 0.84%. This indicates that DLFNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLFNXBILDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

0.84%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

2.39%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

3.08%

+0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.28%

4.43%

+0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.31%

4.08%

+0.23%

DLFNX vs. BILDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLFNX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than BILDX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

DLFNX vs. BILDX - Dividend Comparison

DLFNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, less than BILDX's 4.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BILDX
DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund
4.56%4.64%4.11%3.42%3.31%3.45%2.89%3.40%3.18%3.22%0.00%0.00%
DLFNX
DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund
4.12%4.62%4.96%4.41%3.72%2.87%2.92%3.17%3.10%2.65%2.71%3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, DLFNX and BILDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DLFNX has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to BILDX (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLFNX dropped -17.33% vs BILDX's -15.68%.

BILDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLFNX and BILDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer