PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLFNX vs. DBCMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLFNX vs. DBCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund (DLFNX) and DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLFNX achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than DBCMX's 29.78% return. Over the past 10 years, DLFNX has underperformed DBCMX with an annualized return of 1.52%, while DBCMX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.53% annualized return.


DLFNX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.66%
6M
-1.04%
YTD
-0.73%
1Y
1.75%
3Y*
4.19%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*
1.52%
ALL TIME*
3.05%

DBCMX

1D
-0.43%
1M
8.57%
6M
23.78%
YTD
29.78%
1Y
35.56%
3Y*
9.18%
5Y*
9.45%
10Y*
7.53%
ALL TIME*
7.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DLFNX vs. DBCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLFNX
DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund
-0.73%7.28%2.77%6.18%-13.08%-0.50%5.25%7.82%-0.27%4.41%
DBCMX
DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund
29.78%6.10%0.45%-3.96%13.40%31.24%-6.07%4.78%-10.65%9.17%

Correlation

The correlation between DLFNX and DBCMX is -0.32, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

-0.09

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between DLFNX and DBCMX has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.09 to -0.32, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLFNX vs. DBCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DLFNX
DLFNX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
DLFNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLFNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLFNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
DLFNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLFNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

DBCMX
DBCMX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DBCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
DBCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DLFNX vs. DBCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund (DLFNX) and DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DLFNXDBCMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.39

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

2.79

-1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.11

10.33

-8.22

DLFNX vs. DBCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLFNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the DBCMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLFNX and DBCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DLFNX vs. DBCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLFNX drawdown since its inception was -17.33%, smaller than the maximum DBCMX drawdown of -37.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLFNX and DBCMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLFNXDBCMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.33%

-37.62%

+20.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.96%

-11.98%

+9.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.82%

-14.75%

+9.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.33%

-27.60%

+10.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.33%

-37.62%

+20.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.28%

-3.20%

+0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.72%

-13.16%

+10.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

3.25%

-2.02%

Volatility

DLFNX vs. DBCMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund (DLFNX) is 1.08%, while DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX) has a volatility of 4.43%. This indicates that DLFNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLFNXDBCMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

4.43%

-3.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

12.88%

-9.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

14.67%

-11.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.28%

16.24%

-10.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.31%

14.61%

-10.30%

DLFNX vs. DBCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLFNX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than DBCMX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

DLFNX vs. DBCMX - Dividend Comparison

DLFNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than DBCMX's 2.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBCMX
DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund
2.34%3.04%2.89%3.30%46.88%13.53%0.00%1.04%1.21%5.23%0.51%0.00%
DLFNX
DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund
4.12%4.62%4.96%4.41%3.72%2.87%2.92%3.17%3.10%2.65%2.71%3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


DLFNX and DBCMX have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBCMX has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to DLFNX (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLFNX dropped -17.33% vs DBCMX's -37.62%.

DBCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLFNX and DBCMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer