PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLFE vs. UXJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLFE vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - February (DLFE) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DLFE

1D
-0.74%
1M
0.34%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UXJL

1D
-3.02%
1M
0.47%
YTD
8.90%
6M
8.35%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLFE vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DLFE and UXJL is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2026

0.96

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLFE vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - February (DLFE) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DLFE vs. UXJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DLFEUXJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.98

1.55

+0.44

Drawdowns

DLFE vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLFE drawdown since its inception was -5.03%, smaller than the maximum UXJL drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLFE and UXJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLFEUXJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.03%

-10.29%

+5.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-3.32%

+2.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.98%

-1.51%

+0.53%

Volatility

DLFE vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLFEUXJLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.01%

14.24%

-6.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.01%

14.24%

-6.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.01%

14.24%

-6.23%

DLFE vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DLFE and UXJL have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Dividends

DLFE vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither DLFE nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, DLFE and UXJL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DLFE and UXJL have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

DLFE and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLFE and UXJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer