DLCFX vs. DMSFX
DLCFX (Destinations Large Cap Equity Fund) and DMSFX (Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund) are both mutual funds - DLCFX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Destinations Funds, while DMSFX is a Multistrategy fund managed by Destinations Funds. Over the past 5 years, DLCFX returned 9.34%/yr vs 4.04%/yr for DMSFX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DLCFX charges 0.80%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for DMSFX.
Performance
DLCFX vs. DMSFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DLCFX achieves a 5.20% return, which is significantly higher than DMSFX's 0.33% return.
DLCFX
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- 5.20%
- 6M
- 4.12%
- 1Y
- 17.23%
- 3Y*
- 17.70%
- 5Y*
- 9.34%
- 10Y*
- —
DMSFX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 3.59%
- 3Y*
- 5.83%
- 5Y*
- 4.04%
- 10Y*
- —
DLCFX vs. DMSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLCFX Destinations Large Cap Equity Fund | 5.20% | 14.72% | 20.72% | 24.88% | -18.90% | 20.57% | 21.14% | 28.72% | -6.04% | 14.37% |
DMSFX Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund | 0.33% | 3.65% | 6.40% | 12.82% | -3.45% | 5.22% | 10.01% | 8.93% | -4.99% | 2.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between DLCFX and DMSFX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2017 | 0.63 |
The correlation between DLCFX and DMSFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DLCFX vs. DMSFX — Risk / Return Rank
DLCFX
DMSFX
DLCFX vs. DMSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Destinations Large Cap Equity Fund (DLCFX) and Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund (DMSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DLCFX | DMSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.27 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 1.58 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.72 | 4.68 | +3.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DLCFX vs. DMSFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DLCFX drawdown since its inception was -34.88%, which is greater than DMSFX's maximum drawdown of -21.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLCFX and DMSFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DLCFX | DMSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.88% | -21.11% | -13.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.83% | -2.47% | -7.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.58% | -5.02% | -21.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.94% | -6.84% | -21.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.16% | -0.54% | -1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.34% | -1.59% | -4.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 0.82% | +1.59% |
Volatility
DLCFX vs. DMSFX - Volatility Comparison
Destinations Large Cap Equity Fund (DLCFX) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund (DMSFX) at 0.55%. This indicates that DLCFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DLCFX | DMSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.44% | 0.55% | +3.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.67% | 1.60% | +8.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.11% | 2.77% | +9.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.99% | 3.68% | +16.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.18% | 5.02% | +15.16% |
DLCFX vs. DMSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DLCFX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than DMSFX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
DLCFX vs. DMSFX - Dividend Comparison
DLCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.90%, more than DMSFX's 3.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLCFX Destinations Large Cap Equity Fund | 6.90% | 7.26% | 15.20% | 4.70% | 5.64% | 17.51% | 1.92% | 1.79% | 3.76% | 0.67% |
DMSFX Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund | 3.74% | 3.42% | 6.41% | 6.62% | 3.05% | 4.68% | 1.48% | 4.64% | 4.31% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DLCFX and DMSFX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DLCFX has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to DMSFX (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLCFX dropped -34.88% vs DMSFX's -21.11%.
DLCFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DLCFX and DMSFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer