PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLCFX vs. DMSFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLCFX vs. DMSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Destinations Large Cap Equity Fund (DLCFX) and Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund (DMSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLCFX achieves a 5.20% return, which is significantly higher than DMSFX's 0.33% return.


DLCFX

1D
-0.64%
1M
-0.46%
YTD
5.20%
6M
4.12%
1Y
17.23%
3Y*
17.70%
5Y*
9.34%
10Y*

DMSFX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
0.33%
6M
0.29%
1Y
3.59%
3Y*
5.83%
5Y*
4.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLCFX vs. DMSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLCFX
Destinations Large Cap Equity Fund
5.20%14.72%20.72%24.88%-18.90%20.57%21.14%28.72%-6.04%14.37%
DMSFX
Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund
0.33%3.65%6.40%12.82%-3.45%5.22%10.01%8.93%-4.99%2.93%

Correlation

The correlation between DLCFX and DMSFX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2017

0.63

The correlation between DLCFX and DMSFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLCFX vs. DMSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLCFX
DLCFX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
DLCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
DLCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

DMSFX
DMSFX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
DMSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
DMSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLCFX vs. DMSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Destinations Large Cap Equity Fund (DLCFX) and Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund (DMSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DLCFXDMSFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.27

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

1.58

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.72

4.68

+3.04

DLCFX vs. DMSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLCFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the DMSFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLCFX and DMSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DLCFX vs. DMSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLCFX drawdown since its inception was -34.88%, which is greater than DMSFX's maximum drawdown of -21.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLCFX and DMSFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLCFXDMSFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.88%

-21.11%

-13.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.83%

-2.47%

-7.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.58%

-5.02%

-21.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.94%

-6.84%

-21.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-0.54%

-1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.34%

-1.59%

-4.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

0.82%

+1.59%

Volatility

DLCFX vs. DMSFX - Volatility Comparison

Destinations Large Cap Equity Fund (DLCFX) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund (DMSFX) at 0.55%. This indicates that DLCFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLCFXDMSFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

0.55%

+3.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

1.60%

+8.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.11%

2.77%

+9.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.99%

3.68%

+16.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.18%

5.02%

+15.16%

DLCFX vs. DMSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLCFX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than DMSFX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

DLCFX vs. DMSFX - Dividend Comparison

DLCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.90%, more than DMSFX's 3.74% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLCFX
Destinations Large Cap Equity Fund
6.90%7.26%15.20%4.70%5.64%17.51%1.92%1.79%3.76%0.67%
DMSFX
Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund
3.74%3.42%6.41%6.62%3.05%4.68%1.48%4.64%4.31%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DLCFX and DMSFX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DLCFX has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to DMSFX (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLCFX dropped -34.88% vs DMSFX's -21.11%.

DLCFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLCFX and DMSFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer