PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLB vs. LMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DLB vs. LMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLB achieves a -17.26% return, which is significantly lower than LMT's 13.04% return. Over the past 10 years, DLB has underperformed LMT with an annualized return of 2.40%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively higher 11.37% annualized return.


DLB

1D
-0.40%
1M
-3.24%
YTD
-17.26%
6M
-21.32%
1Y
-28.66%
3Y*
-13.16%
5Y*
-10.74%
10Y*
2.40%

LMT

1D
-1.52%
1M
4.60%
YTD
13.04%
6M
13.84%
1Y
18.25%
3Y*
8.98%
5Y*
9.78%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLB vs. LMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLB
Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
-17.26%-16.27%-7.95%23.82%-24.90%-0.99%42.99%12.63%0.78%38.73%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
13.04%2.47%10.02%-4.31%40.48%3.15%-6.49%52.55%-16.35%31.77%

Correlation

The correlation between DLB and LMT is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2005

0.26

Over the past year, the correlation between DLB and LMT has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.26, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DLB:

$5.02B

LMT:

$124.87B

EPS

DLB:

$2.53

LMT:

$20.61

PE Ratio

DLB:

20.79

LMT:

26.21

PS Ratio

DLB:

3.71

LMT:

1.67

PB Ratio

DLB:

1.92

LMT:

16.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

DLB:

$1.36B

LMT:

$75.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DLB:

$1.19B

LMT:

$7.37B

EBITDA (TTM)

DLB:

$347.35M

LMT:

$8.09B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLB vs. LMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLB
DLB Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
DLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLB Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
DLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLB Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

LMT
LMT Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
LMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMT Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
LMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMT Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLB vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DLBLMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.14

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

0.73

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.93

1.69

-3.63

DLB vs. LMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLB Sharpe Ratio is -1.14, which is lower than the LMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLB and LMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DLB vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLB drawdown since its inception was -62.19%, smaller than the maximum LMT drawdown of -79.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLB and LMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLBLMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.19%

-79.29%

+17.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.11%

-25.15%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.92%

-31.79%

-7.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.41%

-31.79%

-12.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.04%

-36.67%

-8.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.04%

-19.63%

-25.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.37%

-26.83%

+4.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.84%

10.81%

+4.03%

Volatility

DLB vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) is 6.02%, while Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) has a volatility of 7.02%. This indicates that DLB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLBLMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.02%

7.02%

-1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.37%

20.04%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.14%

26.71%

-1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.03%

22.99%

+2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.61%

23.76%

+2.85%

Dividends

DLB vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison

DLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than LMT's 2.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLB
Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
2.68%2.10%1.57%1.29%1.45%0.96%0.91%1.15%1.08%0.94%1.11%1.25%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
2.53%2.76%2.62%2.68%2.34%2.98%2.76%2.31%3.13%2.32%2.71%2.83%

Financials

DLB vs. LMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dolby Laboratories, Inc. and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
395.63M
18.02B
(DLB) Total Revenue
(LMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DLB vs. LMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Dolby Laboratories, Inc. and Lockheed Martin Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
88.7%
11.5%
Portfolio components
DLB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. reported a gross profit of 350.90M and revenue of 395.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.7%.

LMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.08B and revenue of 18.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.

DLB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. reported an operating income of 112.95M and revenue of 395.63M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.6%.

LMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported an operating income of 2.06B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

DLB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. reported a net income of 94.92M and revenue of 395.63M, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.

LMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a net income of 1.49B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DLB and LMT have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMT has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to DLB (6.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLB dropped -62.19% vs LMT's -79.29%.

LMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLB and LMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer