PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJUL vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJUL vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July (DJUL) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJUL achieves a 4.92% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 70.69% return.


DJUL

1D
0.03%
1M
1.36%
YTD
4.92%
6M
5.41%
1Y
16.19%
3Y*
14.11%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*

UGA

1D
-2.73%
1M
-12.25%
YTD
70.69%
6M
59.72%
1Y
79.48%
3Y*
20.80%
5Y*
24.41%
10Y*
14.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJUL vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DJUL
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July
4.92%13.31%15.02%18.08%-8.28%6.18%4.51%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
70.69%-2.00%3.77%1.27%46.34%68.49%25.83%

Correlation

The correlation between DJUL and UGA is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2020

0.08

The correlation between DJUL and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJUL vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJUL
DJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJUL vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July (DJUL) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DJULUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.37

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

5.37

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.67

12.86

+7.81

DJUL vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is comparable to the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJUL and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DJULUGADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.90

2.27

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

0.71

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.12

+1.00

Drawdowns

DJUL vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJUL drawdown since its inception was -12.54%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJUL and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJULUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.54%

-86.59%

+74.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.25%

-14.88%

+10.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.29%

-26.68%

+15.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.54%

-38.11%

+25.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-14.75%

+14.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.99%

-36.76%

+34.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

6.20%

-5.41%

Volatility

DJUL vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July (DJUL) is 0.53%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 11.64%. This indicates that DJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJULUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.53%

11.64%

-11.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.16%

30.48%

-26.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.62%

35.27%

-29.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.39%

34.40%

-26.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.94%

37.27%

-29.33%

DJUL vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJUL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

DJUL vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

Neither DJUL nor UGA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DJUL and UGA have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGA has higher volatility (11.64%) compared to DJUL (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJUL dropped -12.54% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 5-year performance, UGA leads with 24.41% vs 8.93% for DJUL. On fees, UGA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UGA has performed better with a 24.41% return vs 8.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UGA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DJUL.

DJUL and UGA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

DJUL is categorized as Options Trading, while UGA is Oil & Gas. DJUL tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect July Series Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DJUL and 0.75% for UGA.

DJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJUL and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer