PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJTU vs. UMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJTU vs. UMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long DJT Daily Target ETF (DJTU) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJTU achieves a -72.52% return, which is significantly lower than UMI's 21.76% return.


DJTU

1D
-8.86%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
-72.52%
6M
-77.26%
1Y
-90.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UMI

1D
0.96%
1M
-5.27%
YTD
21.76%
6M
23.01%
1Y
24.46%
3Y*
27.84%
5Y*
20.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJTU vs. UMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DJTU and UMI is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2025

0.00

The correlation between DJTU and UMI shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJTU vs. UMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJTU
DJTU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
DJTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJTU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
DJTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJTU Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

UMI
UMI Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
UMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMI Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
UMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMI Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJTU vs. UMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long DJT Daily Target ETF (DJTU) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DJTUUMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.30

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.98

3.28

-4.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.36

8.47

-9.83

DJTU vs. UMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJTU Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the UMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJTU and UMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DJTU vs. UMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJTU drawdown since its inception was -96.27%, which is greater than UMI's maximum drawdown of -48.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJTU and UMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJTUUMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.27%

-48.08%

-48.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-92.19%

-7.50%

-84.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.01%

-5.35%

-90.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.24%

-6.59%

-61.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

66.24%

2.90%

+63.34%

Volatility

DJTU vs. UMI - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long DJT Daily Target ETF (DJTU) has a higher volatility of 39.84% compared to USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) at 5.33%. This indicates that DJTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJTUUMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

39.84%

5.33%

+34.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

107.65%

11.05%

+96.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

135.21%

14.23%

+120.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

141.06%

19.45%

+121.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

141.06%

23.16%

+117.90%

DJTU vs. UMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJTU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than UMI's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

DJTU vs. UMI - Dividend Comparison

DJTU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DJTU
T-Rex 2X Long DJT Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF
6.02%6.23%4.39%4.67%4.36%3.00%2.18%2.47%2.48%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


DJTU and UMI have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DJTU has higher volatility (39.84%) compared to UMI (5.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJTU dropped -96.27% vs UMI's -48.08%.

On 1-year performance, UMI leads with 24.46% vs -90.11% for DJTU. On fees, UMI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, UMI has been the lower-risk option at 5.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, UMI has performed better with a 24.46% return vs -90.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UMI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for DJTU.

UMI has the higher dividend yield at 6.02%, compared with 0.00% for DJTU.

DJTU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while UMI is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Wainwright, Inc.. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for DJTU and 0.85% for UMI.

UMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJTU and UMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer