PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJTU vs. QTJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJTU vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long DJT Daily Target ETF (DJTU) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJTU achieves a -66.41% return, which is significantly lower than QTJL's 7.18% return.


DJTU

1D
3.53%
1M
-11.41%
YTD
-66.41%
6M
-63.54%
1Y
-92.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QTJL

1D
0.02%
1M
1.08%
YTD
7.18%
6M
7.93%
1Y
20.28%
3Y*
19.18%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJTU vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DJTU and QTJL is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2025

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJTU vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJTU
DJTU Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
DJTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJTU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
DJTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJTU Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

QTJL
QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJTU vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long DJT Daily Target ETF (DJTU) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DJTUQTJLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

1.41

-0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

3.05

-4.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.34

16.05

-17.40

DJTU vs. QTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJTU Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the QTJL Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJTU and QTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DJTUQTJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.70

2.04

-2.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.64

0.52

-1.16

Drawdowns

DJTU vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJTU drawdown since its inception was -95.98%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJTU and QTJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJTUQTJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.98%

-33.40%

-62.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-93.12%

-6.68%

-86.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.13%

0.00%

-95.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.50%

-7.93%

-59.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

70.42%

1.27%

+69.15%

Volatility

DJTU vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long DJT Daily Target ETF (DJTU) has a higher volatility of 26.75% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 0.30%. This indicates that DJTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJTUQTJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.75%

0.30%

+26.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

103.96%

7.60%

+96.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

132.84%

9.99%

+122.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

140.70%

20.42%

+120.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

140.70%

20.42%

+120.28%

DJTU vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJTU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

DJTU vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither DJTU nor QTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DJTU and QTJL have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DJTU has higher volatility (26.75%) compared to QTJL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJTU dropped -95.98% vs QTJL's -33.40%.

On 1-year performance, QTJL leads with 20.28% vs -92.27% for DJTU. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QTJL has performed better with a 20.28% return vs -92.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for DJTU.

DJTU and QTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for DJTU and 0.79% for QTJL.

QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJTU and QTJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer