DJTU vs. QTJL
DJTU (T-Rex 2X Long DJT Daily Target ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. DJTU is passively managed, while QTJL is actively managed. Over the past year, DJTU returned -89.88% vs 16.67% for QTJL. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DJTU charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.
Performance
DJTU vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DJTU achieves a -70.74% return, which is significantly lower than QTJL's 6.61% return.
DJTU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 13.86%
- 6M
- -75.00%
- YTD
- -70.74%
- 1Y
- -89.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTJL
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- 6M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 6.61%
- 1Y
- 16.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.10%
- 10Y*
- —
DJTU vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DJTU T-Rex 2X Long DJT Daily Target ETF | -70.74% | -82.18% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 6.61% | 22.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between DJTU and QTJL is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DJTU vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank
DJTU
QTJL
DJTU vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long DJT Daily Target ETF (DJTU) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DJTU | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.33 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | 2.49 | -3.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | 12.69 | -13.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DJTU vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DJTU drawdown since its inception was -97.02%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJTU and QTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DJTU | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.02% | -33.40% | -63.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -93.76% | -6.68% | -87.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.75% | -0.86% | -94.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.31% | -7.79% | -61.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 69.45% | 1.31% | +68.14% |
Volatility
DJTU vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Long DJT Daily Target ETF (DJTU) has a higher volatility of 43.74% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 3.48%. This indicates that DJTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DJTU | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 43.74% | 3.48% | +40.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 86.12% | 8.08% | +78.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 137.41% | 10.35% | +127.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 140.86% | 20.31% | +120.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 140.86% | 20.27% | +120.59% |
DJTU vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DJTU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
DJTU vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither DJTU nor QTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DJTU and QTJL have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DJTU has higher volatility (43.74%) compared to QTJL (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJTU dropped -97.02% vs QTJL's -33.40%.
On 1-year performance, QTJL leads with 16.67% vs -89.88% for DJTU. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QTJL has performed better with a 16.67% return vs -89.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for DJTU.
DJTU and QTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for DJTU and 0.79% for QTJL.
QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DJTU and QTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer