DJTU vs. LULG
DJTU (T-Rex 2X Long DJT Daily Target ETF) and LULG (Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. DJTU is passively managed, while LULG is actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DJTU charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for LULG.
Performance
DJTU vs. LULG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DJTU achieves a -62.93% return, which is significantly higher than LULG's -74.12% return.
DJTU
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- 34.91%
- 6M
- -65.56%
- YTD
- -62.93%
- 1Y
- -88.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LULG
- 1D
- -4.15%
- 1M
- 5.15%
- 6M
- -72.37%
- YTD
- -74.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DJTU vs. LULG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DJTU T-Rex 2X Long DJT Daily Target ETF | -62.93% | -25.29% |
LULG Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF | -74.12% | 55.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between DJTU and LULG is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DJTU vs. LULG — Risk / Return Rank
DJTU
LULG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DJTU vs. LULG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long DJT Daily Target ETF (DJTU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DJTU | LULG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DJTU vs. LULG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DJTU drawdown since its inception was -97.02%, which is greater than LULG's maximum drawdown of -79.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJTU and LULG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DJTU | LULG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.02% | -79.88% | -17.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -93.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.62% | -76.03% | -18.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.69% | -40.53% | -29.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 70.58% | — | — |
Volatility
DJTU vs. LULG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DJTU | LULG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 37.53% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 87.17% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 138.04% | 86.79% | +51.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 140.67% | 86.79% | +53.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 140.67% | 86.79% | +53.88% |
DJTU vs. LULG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DJTU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than LULG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DJTU vs. LULG - Dividend Comparison
Neither DJTU nor LULG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DJTU and LULG have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LULG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LULG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for DJTU.
DJTU and LULG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for DJTU and 0.75% for LULG.
Find the right allocation for DJTU and LULG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer