DJIA vs. QYLD
DJIA (Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DJIA is a Derivative Income fund tracking the DJIA Cboe BuyWrite v2 Index, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DJIA returned 10.45%/yr vs 13.76%/yr for QYLD. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
DJIA vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DJIA achieves a 3.46% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.88% return.
DJIA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.03%
- YTD
- 3.46%
- 6M
- 3.90%
- 1Y
- 14.27%
- 3Y*
- 10.45%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QYLD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 7.88%
- 6M
- 9.91%
- 1Y
- 23.70%
- 3Y*
- 13.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
DJIA vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DJIA Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF | 3.46% | 9.11% | 14.52% | 9.15% | -2.80% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 7.88% | 9.28% | 19.35% | 22.77% | -11.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between DJIA and QYLD is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.60 |
The correlation between DJIA and QYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (3 years) to 0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DJIA vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DJIA
QYLD
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
DJIA
QYLD
Industrials
DJIA
QYLD
Technology
DJIA
QYLD
Healthcare
DJIA
QYLD
Consumer Cyclical
DJIA
QYLD
Consumer Defensive
DJIA
QYLD
Basic Materials
DJIA
QYLD
Energy
DJIA
QYLD
Communication Services
DJIA
QYLD
Real Estate
DJIA
-
QYLD
Utilities
DJIA
-
QYLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DJIA vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
DJIA
QYLD
DJIA vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DJIA | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.63 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 4.79 | -2.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.25 | 28.10 | -20.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DJIA | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 2.78 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.59 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
DJIA vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DJIA drawdown since its inception was -16.91%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJIA and QYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DJIA | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.91% | -24.75% | +7.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.34% | -4.97% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.09% | -19.06% | +6.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.06% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.59% | -3.84% | +0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 0.85% | +1.12% |
Volatility
DJIA vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA) is 1.66%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a volatility of 1.84%. This indicates that DJIA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DJIA | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.66% | 1.84% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.24% | 7.12% | -0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.74% | 8.57% | -0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.19% | 14.70% | -3.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.19% | 15.49% | -4.30% |
DJIA vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DJIA and QYLD have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
DJIA vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
DJIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.82%, less than QYLD's 11.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DJIA Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF | 10.82% | 10.60% | 11.44% | 7.16% | 9.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.46% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DJIA and QYLD have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QYLD has higher volatility (1.84%) compared to DJIA (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJIA dropped -16.91% vs QYLD's -24.75%.
On 3-year performance, QYLD leads with 13.76% vs 10.45% for DJIA. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, DJIA has been the lower-risk option at 1.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QYLD has performed better with a 13.76% return vs 10.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DJIA and QYLD have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.46%, compared with 10.82% for DJIA.
DJIA is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. DJIA tracks DJIA Cboe BuyWrite v2 Index, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2.
QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DJIA and QYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer