PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJIA vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJIA vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJIA achieves a 3.46% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.88% return.


DJIA

1D
0.00%
1M
3.03%
YTD
3.46%
6M
3.90%
1Y
14.27%
3Y*
10.45%
5Y*
10Y*

QYLD

1D
0.00%
1M
1.40%
YTD
7.88%
6M
9.91%
1Y
23.70%
3Y*
13.76%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
9.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJIA vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DJIA
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF
3.46%9.11%14.52%9.15%-2.80%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
7.88%9.28%19.35%22.77%-11.65%

Correlation

The correlation between DJIA and QYLD is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022

0.60

The correlation between DJIA and QYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (3 years) to 0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DJIA vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DJIA
QYLD

Financial Services

27.2%
0.2%

Industrials

18.4%
2.8%

Technology

17.1%
53.8%

Healthcare

13.1%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
7.7%

Basic Materials

4.0%
1.1%

Energy

2.4%
0.6%

Communication Services

1.9%
15.8%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Financial Services

DJIA
27.2%
QYLD
0.2%

Industrials

DJIA
18.4%
QYLD
2.8%

Technology

DJIA
17.1%
QYLD
53.8%

Healthcare

DJIA
13.1%
QYLD
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DJIA
11.6%
QYLD
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

DJIA
4.4%
QYLD
7.7%

Basic Materials

DJIA
4.0%
QYLD
1.1%

Energy

DJIA
2.4%
QYLD
0.6%

Communication Services

DJIA
1.9%
QYLD
15.8%

Real Estate

DJIA

-

QYLD
0.1%

Utilities

DJIA

-

QYLD
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJIA vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJIA
DJIA Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
DJIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJIA Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DJIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJIA Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJIA vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DJIAQYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.63

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

4.79

-2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.25

28.10

-20.85

DJIA vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJIA Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJIA and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DJIAQYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

2.78

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.59

+0.10

Drawdowns

DJIA vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJIA drawdown since its inception was -16.91%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJIA and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJIAQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.91%

-24.75%

+7.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-4.97%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.09%

-19.06%

+6.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.06%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.59%

-3.84%

+0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

0.85%

+1.12%

Volatility

DJIA vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA) is 1.66%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a volatility of 1.84%. This indicates that DJIA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJIAQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

1.84%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.24%

7.12%

-0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.74%

8.57%

-0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.19%

14.70%

-3.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.19%

15.49%

-4.30%

DJIA vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DJIA and QYLD have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

DJIA vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

DJIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.82%, less than QYLD's 11.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DJIA
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF
10.82%10.60%11.44%7.16%9.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.46%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


DJIA and QYLD have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QYLD has higher volatility (1.84%) compared to DJIA (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJIA dropped -16.91% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

On 3-year performance, QYLD leads with 13.76% vs 10.45% for DJIA. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, DJIA has been the lower-risk option at 1.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QYLD has performed better with a 13.76% return vs 10.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DJIA and QYLD have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.46%, compared with 10.82% for DJIA.

DJIA is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. DJIA tracks DJIA Cboe BuyWrite v2 Index, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2.

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJIA and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer