DJD vs. XLG
DJD (Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Average Dividend ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DJD is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average Yield Weight, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DJD returned 12.49%/yr vs 17.41%/yr for XLG. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DJD charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.
Performance
DJD vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DJD achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's 8.82% return. Over the past 10 years, DJD has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 12.49%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.41% annualized return.
DJD
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 4.40%
- YTD
- 11.48%
- 6M
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 25.31%
- 3Y*
- 18.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.49%
XLG
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 8.82%
- 6M
- 8.60%
- 1Y
- 30.80%
- 3Y*
- 24.94%
- 5Y*
- 16.76%
- 10Y*
- 17.41%
DJD vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DJD Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Average Dividend ETF | 11.48% | 15.83% | 13.66% | 9.41% | -0.73% | 22.40% | 0.87% | 22.00% | 0.03% | 21.65% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 8.82% | 19.51% | 33.49% | 38.16% | -24.29% | 30.77% | 24.15% | 32.04% | -3.59% | 23.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between DJD and XLG is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2015 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DJD and XLG has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DJD vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DJD
XLG
Healthcare
Financial Services
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
DJD
XLG
Financial Services
DJD
XLG
Technology
DJD
XLG
Communication Services
DJD
XLG
Consumer Cyclical
DJD
XLG
Consumer Defensive
DJD
XLG
Industrials
DJD
XLG
Energy
DJD
XLG
Basic Materials
DJD
XLG
Real Estate
DJD
-
XLG
-
Utilities
DJD
-
XLG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DJD vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank
DJD
XLG
DJD vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Average Dividend ETF (DJD) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DJD | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.49 | 2.33 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.76 | 3.14 | +0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.41 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.51 | 2.55 | +1.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.27 | 9.60 | +3.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DJD | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 2.33 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.90 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.93 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.63 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
DJD vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DJD drawdown since its inception was -34.66%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJD and XLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DJD | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.66% | -52.39% | +17.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.64% | -12.41% | +6.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.28% | -20.70% | +8.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.94% | -28.02% | +8.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.66% | -30.46% | -4.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.29% | +0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.75% | -7.64% | +3.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 3.30% | -1.39% |
Volatility
DJD vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Average Dividend ETF (DJD) is 2.59%, while Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that DJD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DJD | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 2.92% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.51% | 9.73% | -2.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.20% | 13.28% | -3.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.35% | 18.68% | -5.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.65% | 18.84% | -2.19% |
DJD vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DJD has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DJD vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
DJD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than XLG's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DJD Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Average Dividend ETF | 2.41% | 2.62% | 3.00% | 3.49% | 3.16% | 2.82% | 3.47% | 2.80% | 2.66% | 2.75% | 2.46% | 0.08% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.59% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DJD and XLG have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLG has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to DJD (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJD dropped -34.66% vs XLG's -52.39%.
On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 17.41% vs 12.49% for DJD. On fees, DJD is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, DJD has been the lower-risk option at 2.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 17.41% return vs 12.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DJD is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLG.
DJD has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 0.59% for XLG.
DJD is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XLG is S&P 500. DJD tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average Yield Weight, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for DJD and 0.20% for XLG.
DJD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DJD and XLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer