PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIVS vs. SDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIVS vs. SDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF (DIVS) and Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVS achieves a 12.05% return, which is significantly higher than SDIV's 8.19% return.


DIVS

1D
-0.08%
1M
2.99%
6M
8.15%
YTD
12.05%
1Y
16.97%
3Y*
13.13%
5Y*
9.70%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.99%

SDIV

1D
-0.44%
1M
2.09%
6M
1.12%
YTD
8.19%
1Y
19.07%
3Y*
13.35%
5Y*
1.38%
10Y*
-0.19%
ALL TIME*
1.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$40.08K$44.03K$61.52K
$7.29M$9.92M$11.09M

DIVS vs. SDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DIVS
SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF
12.05%11.66%12.60%15.98%-8.97%17.30%
SDIV
Global X SuperDividend ETF
8.19%29.12%1.77%5.46%-26.43%-4.78%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVS and SDIV is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2021

0.63

The correlation between DIVS and SDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

DIVS vs. SDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DIVS
SDIV

Industrials

25.2%
10.4%

Technology

21.4%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

21.0%
3.6%

Healthcare

13.6%
0.9%

Financial Services

13.1%
15.5%

Communication Services

3.3%
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

2.4%
5.3%

Basic Materials

-

3.7%

Energy

-

13.3%

Real Estate

-

33.0%

Utilities

-

1.0%

Industrials

DIVS
25.2%
SDIV
10.4%

Technology

DIVS
21.4%
SDIV
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

DIVS
21.0%
SDIV
3.6%

Healthcare

DIVS
13.6%
SDIV
0.9%

Financial Services

DIVS
13.1%
SDIV
15.5%

Communication Services

DIVS
3.3%
SDIV
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DIVS
2.4%
SDIV
5.3%

Basic Materials

DIVS

-

SDIV
3.7%

Energy

DIVS

-

SDIV
13.3%

Real Estate

DIVS

-

SDIV
33.0%

Utilities

DIVS

-

SDIV
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIVS vs. SDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DIVS
DIVS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DIVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVS Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

SDIV
SDIV Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DIVS vs. SDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF (DIVS) and Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DIVSSDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

2.48

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.75

6.84

-1.09

DIVS vs. SDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVS Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the SDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVS and SDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DIVS vs. SDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVS drawdown since its inception was -29.55%, smaller than the maximum SDIV drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVS and SDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVSSDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.55%

-56.90%

+27.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.62%

-7.35%

-3.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.61%

-18.64%

+6.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.71%

-38.69%

+17.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-16.05%

+15.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-18.57%

+14.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.66%

+0.24%

Volatility

DIVS vs. SDIV - Volatility Comparison

SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF (DIVS) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) at 2.76%. This indicates that DIVS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVSSDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

2.76%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.69%

9.82%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.53%

12.30%

-1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.07%

16.80%

-3.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.88%

18.87%

+7.01%

DIVS vs. SDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SDIV's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIVS vs. SDIV - Dividend Comparison

DIVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than SDIV's 9.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIVS
SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF
2.78%2.61%2.66%3.14%5.93%3.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SDIV
Global X SuperDividend ETF
9.07%9.59%11.33%11.73%14.17%8.95%7.96%8.73%9.22%6.66%6.95%7.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIVS and SDIV have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVS has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to SDIV (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVS dropped -29.55% vs SDIV's -56.90%.

On 5-year performance, DIVS leads with 9.70% vs 1.38% for SDIV. On fees, SDIV is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, SDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DIVS has performed better with a 9.70% return vs 1.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SDIV is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVS.

SDIV has the higher dividend yield at 9.07%, compared with 2.78% for DIVS.

They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DIVS and 0.58% for SDIV.

DIVS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIVS and SDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer