DIVS vs. NZAC
DIVS (SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF) and NZAC (SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF) are both Global Equities funds. DIVS is actively managed, while NZAC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DIVS returned 9.70%/yr vs 9.32%/yr for NZAC. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DIVS charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for NZAC.
Performance
DIVS vs. NZAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIVS achieves a 12.05% return, which is significantly higher than NZAC's 7.28% return.
DIVS
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- 6M
- 8.15%
- YTD
- 12.05%
- 1Y
- 16.97%
- 3Y*
- 13.13%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.99%
NZAC
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 6.19%
- YTD
- 7.28%
- 1Y
- 18.88%
- 3Y*
- 16.58%
- 5Y*
- 9.32%
- 10Y*
- 11.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $40.08K | $44.03K | $61.52K | |
| $201.08K | $143.38K | $203.83K |
DIVS vs. NZAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVS SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF | 12.05% | 11.66% | 12.60% | 15.98% | -8.97% | 17.30% |
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF | 7.28% | 20.55% | 16.67% | 23.22% | -19.77% | 12.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIVS and NZAC is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2021 | 0.81 |
The correlation between DIVS and NZAC shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIVS vs. NZAC — Risk / Return Rank
DIVS
NZAC
DIVS vs. NZAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF (DIVS) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIVS | NZAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.22 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 1.74 | -0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.75 | 6.88 | -1.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIVS vs. NZAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVS drawdown since its inception was -29.55%, smaller than the maximum NZAC drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVS and NZAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIVS | NZAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.55% | -33.72% | +4.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.62% | -10.10% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.61% | -16.19% | +3.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.71% | -28.31% | +7.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -2.23% | +2.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.64% | -5.28% | +1.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 2.55% | +0.35% |
Volatility
DIVS vs. NZAC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF (DIVS) is 3.12%, while SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) has a volatility of 4.07%. This indicates that DIVS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NZAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIVS | NZAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 4.07% | -0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.69% | 11.66% | -2.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.53% | 14.03% | -3.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.07% | 16.96% | -3.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.88% | 17.07% | +8.81% |
DIVS vs. NZAC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIVS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than NZAC's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIVS vs. NZAC - Dividend Comparison
DIVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than NZAC's 2.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVS SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF | 2.78% | 2.61% | 2.66% | 3.14% | 5.93% | 3.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF | 2.07% | 1.90% | 1.88% | 1.65% | 1.81% | 1.62% | 1.59% | 2.17% | 2.53% | 2.20% | 2.00% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIVS and NZAC have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NZAC has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to DIVS (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVS dropped -29.55% vs NZAC's -33.72%.
On 5-year performance, DIVS leads with 9.70% vs 9.32% for NZAC. On fees, NZAC is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, DIVS has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIVS has performed better with a 9.70% return vs 9.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NZAC is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVS.
DIVS has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 2.07% for NZAC.
They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DIVS and 0.12% for NZAC.
DIVS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIVS and NZAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer