DIVS vs. ADIV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DIVS (SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF) and ADIV (SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIVS is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Guinness Atkinson Asset Management, while ADIV is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by Guinness Atkinson Asset Management. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DIVS returned 9.00%/yr vs 6.34%/yr for ADIV. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIVS charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for ADIV.

Performance

DIVS vs. ADIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF (DIVS) and SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DIVS having a 6.02% return and ADIV slightly lower at 5.85%.

DIVS

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: -0.53%
• YTD: 6.02%
• 6M: 5.56%
• 1Y: 10.66%
• 3Y*: 12.30%
• 5Y*: 9.00%
• 10Y*: —

ADIV

• 1D: -2.00%
• 1M: -0.04%
• YTD: 5.85%
• 6M: 5.74%
• 1Y: 13.74%
• 3Y*: 17.39%
• 5Y*: 6.34%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVS vs. ADIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DIVS SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF	6.02%	11.66%	12.60%	15.98%	-8.97%	17.30%
ADIV SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF	5.85%	21.86%	14.47%	12.28%	-18.00%	1.41%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVS and ADIV is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2021	0.62

The correlation between DIVS and ADIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

DIVS vs. ADIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DIVS	ADIV
Industrials	24.8%	2.3%
Technology	22.5%	26.6%
Consumer Defensive	20.6%	5.1%
Financial Services	13.6%	31.8%
Healthcare	12.7%	5.0%
Communication Services	3.2%	3.2%
Consumer Cyclical	2.6%	15.4%
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	8.3%
Utilities	-	2.4%

Return for Risk

DIVS vs. ADIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVS

DIVS Risk / Return Rank: 27
DIVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
DIVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
DIVS Omega Ratio Rank: 27
DIVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
DIVS Martin Ratio Rank: 27

ADIV

ADIV Risk / Return Rank: 29
ADIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
ADIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
ADIV Omega Ratio Rank: 28
ADIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
ADIV Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVS vs. ADIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF (DIVS) and SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DIVS	ADIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	0.99	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.50	1.44	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.18	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.01	1.36	-0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.60	4.40	-0.81

DIVS vs. ADIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVS Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the ADIV Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVS and ADIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DIVS vs. ADIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVS drawdown since its inception was -29.55%, smaller than the maximum ADIV drawdown of -31.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVS and ADIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DIVS	ADIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.55%	-31.55%	+2.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.62%	-10.15%	-0.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.61%	-18.53%	+5.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.71%	-31.55%	+10.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.01%	-3.17%	+1.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.70%	-8.38%	+4.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.97%	3.13%	-0.16%

Volatility

DIVS vs. ADIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF (DIVS) is 2.91%, while SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that DIVS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DIVS	ADIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.91%	5.46%	-2.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.42%	11.23%	-2.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.60%	13.93%	-3.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.07%	16.58%	-3.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.10%	16.40%	+9.70%

DIVS vs. ADIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than ADIV's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

DIVS vs. ADIV - Dividend Comparison

DIVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, less than ADIV's 3.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ADIV SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF	3.66%	2.77%	4.83%	4.55%	2.98%	13.85%
DIVS SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF	3.17%	2.61%	2.66%	3.14%	5.93%	3.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DIVS and ADIV in my portfolio?

DIVS and ADIV have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DIVS or ADIV?

ADIV has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to DIVS (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVS dropped -29.55% vs ADIV's -31.55%.

Which ETF is better, DIVS or ADIV?

On 5-year performance, DIVS leads with 9.00% vs 6.34% for ADIV. On fees, DIVS is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, DIVS has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DIVS or ADIV?

Over the 5-year period, DIVS has performed better with a 9.00% return vs 6.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DIVS or ADIV?

DIVS is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for ADIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DIVS or ADIV?

ADIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 3.17% for DIVS.

What is the main difference between DIVS and ADIV?

DIVS is categorized as Global Equities, while ADIV is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DIVS and 0.78% for ADIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DIVS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.