PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIVP vs. TCAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIVP vs. TCAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF (DIVP) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVP achieves a 7.90% return, which is significantly higher than TCAL's -2.88% return.


DIVP

1D
-0.39%
1M
2.18%
YTD
7.90%
6M
9.10%
1Y
14.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TCAL

1D
0.23%
1M
-1.26%
YTD
-2.88%
6M
-2.97%
1Y
-1.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVP vs. TCAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DIVP and TCAL is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025

0.71

The correlation between DIVP and TCAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

DIVP vs. TCAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DIVP
TCAL

Healthcare

17.9%
18.7%

Financial Services

16.1%
15.0%

Energy

11.6%
1.3%

Industrials

9.3%
19.3%

Consumer Defensive

9.0%
11.3%

Technology

8.6%
11.3%

Communication Services

8.0%
0.9%

Real Estate

6.5%
2.2%

Utilities

6.3%
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

4.4%
8.7%

Basic Materials

2.4%
1.7%

Healthcare

DIVP
17.9%
TCAL
18.7%

Financial Services

DIVP
16.1%
TCAL
15.0%

Energy

DIVP
11.6%
TCAL
1.3%

Industrials

DIVP
9.3%
TCAL
19.3%

Consumer Defensive

DIVP
9.0%
TCAL
11.3%

Technology

DIVP
8.6%
TCAL
11.3%

Communication Services

DIVP
8.0%
TCAL
0.9%

Real Estate

DIVP
6.5%
TCAL
2.2%

Utilities

DIVP
6.3%
TCAL
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DIVP
4.4%
TCAL
8.7%

Basic Materials

DIVP
2.4%
TCAL
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIVP vs. TCAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVP
DIVP Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
DIVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVP Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVP Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

TCAL
TCAL Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
TCAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCAL Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
TCAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCAL Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVP vs. TCAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF (DIVP) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIVPTCALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.97

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

-0.27

+2.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.48

-0.70

+6.18

DIVP vs. TCAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVP Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is higher than the TCAL Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVP and TCAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIVPTCALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

-0.20

+1.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

-0.10

+0.93

Drawdowns

DIVP vs. TCAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVP drawdown since its inception was -12.26%, which is greater than TCAL's maximum drawdown of -7.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVP and TCAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVPTCALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.26%

-7.24%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.28%

-7.00%

+0.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-5.92%

+5.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.44%

-2.02%

-0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

2.67%

-0.10%

Volatility

DIVP vs. TCAL - Volatility Comparison

Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF (DIVP) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL) have volatilities of 2.43% and 2.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVPTCALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

2.46%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.13%

7.08%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.13%

9.31%

+0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.78%

11.25%

+0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.78%

11.25%

+0.53%

DIVP vs. TCAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVP has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than TCAL's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIVP vs. TCAL - Dividend Comparison

DIVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.69%, less than TCAL's 11.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
DIVP
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF
5.69%6.06%5.92%
TCAL
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF
11.96%8.34%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIVP and TCAL have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TCAL has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to DIVP (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVP dropped -12.26% vs TCAL's -7.24%.

On 1-year performance, DIVP leads with 14.04% vs -1.87% for TCAL. On fees, TCAL is cheaper at 0.34% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DIVP has performed better with a 14.04% return vs -1.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TCAL is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DIVP.

TCAL has the higher dividend yield at 11.96%, compared with 5.69% for DIVP.

They also come from different issuers: Cullen and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DIVP and 0.34% for TCAL.

DIVP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIVP and TCAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer