PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIVP vs. REET
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DIVP vs. REET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF (DIVP) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DIVP vs. REET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DIVP
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF
3.87%7.76%5.74%
REET
iShares Global REIT ETF
1.30%7.97%5.53%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVP achieves a 3.87% return, which is significantly higher than REET's 1.30% return.


DIVP

1D
0.88%
1M
-3.84%
YTD
3.87%
6M
6.12%
1Y
5.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

REET

1D
1.45%
1M
-7.25%
YTD
1.30%
6M
0.39%
1Y
7.51%
3Y*
6.78%
5Y*
2.64%
10Y*
3.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DIVP vs. REET - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVP has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than REET's 0.14% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DIVP vs. REET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVP
DIVP Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
DIVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVP Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVP Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

REET
REET Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
REET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REET Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
REET Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
REET Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
REET Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVP vs. REET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF (DIVP) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIVPREETDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.41

0.50

-0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.66

0.78

-0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.11

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

0.69

-0.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.98

2.90

-0.91

DIVP vs. REET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVP Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is comparable to the REET Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVP and REET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIVPREETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

0.50

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.22

+0.50

Correlation

The correlation between DIVP and REET is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DIVP vs. REET - Dividend Comparison

DIVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.90%, more than REET's 3.65% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIVP
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF
5.90%6.06%5.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
REET
iShares Global REIT ETF
3.65%3.67%3.64%3.27%2.43%3.18%2.65%5.25%5.73%3.84%5.37%3.56%

Drawdowns

DIVP vs. REET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVP drawdown since its inception was -12.26%, smaller than the maximum REET drawdown of -44.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVP and REET.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVPREETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.26%

-44.59%

+32.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.01%

-11.70%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.45%

-7.39%

+2.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.44%

-9.91%

+7.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

2.79%

+0.66%

Volatility

DIVP vs. REET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF (DIVP) is 3.15%, while iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) has a volatility of 4.66%. This indicates that DIVP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DIVPREETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

4.66%

-1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.46%

8.28%

-0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.83%

15.07%

-1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.97%

16.92%

-4.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.97%

18.83%

-6.86%