DIVP vs. PBP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DIVP (Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF) and PBP (Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. DIVP is actively managed, while PBP is passively managed. Over the past year, DIVP returned 15.53% vs 17.99% for PBP. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DIVP charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PBP.

Performance

DIVP vs. PBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF (DIVP) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVP achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly higher than PBP's 5.03% return.

DIVP

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 2.49%
• YTD: 8.64%
• 6M: 9.96%
• 1Y: 15.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PBP

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 1.84%
• YTD: 5.03%
• 6M: 6.58%
• 1Y: 17.99%
• 3Y*: 11.67%
• 5Y*: 8.13%
• 10Y*: 7.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVP vs. PBP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DIVP Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF	8.64%	7.76%	5.74%
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	5.03%	8.49%	15.57%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVP and PBP is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024	0.39

DIVP vs. PBP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DIVP	PBP
Healthcare	17.9%	8.6%
Financial Services	16.1%	11.4%
Energy	11.6%	3.3%
Industrials	9.3%	7.8%
Consumer Defensive	9.0%	4.7%
Technology	8.6%	39.5%
Communication Services	8.0%	10.9%
Real Estate	6.5%	1.8%
Utilities	6.3%	2.6%
Consumer Cyclical	4.4%	10.2%
Basic Materials	2.4%	1.8%

Return for Risk

DIVP vs. PBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVP

DIVP Risk / Return Rank: 45
DIVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
DIVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
DIVP Omega Ratio Rank: 41
DIVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
DIVP Martin Ratio Rank: 40

PBP

PBP Risk / Return Rank: 83
PBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
PBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
PBP Omega Ratio Rank: 91
PBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
PBP Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVP vs. PBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF (DIVP) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DIVP	PBP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	2.63	-1.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	3.80	-1.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.59	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.48	3.46	-0.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.06	18.33	-12.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DIVP vs. PBP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVP Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the PBP Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVP and PBP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DIVP	PBP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.54	2.63	-1.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	0.35	+0.51

Drawdowns

DIVP vs. PBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVP drawdown since its inception was -12.26%, smaller than the maximum PBP drawdown of -43.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVP and PBP.

Drawdown Indicators

	DIVP	PBP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.26%	-43.43%	+31.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.28%	-5.22%	-1.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.42%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.09%	-0.04%	-0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.43%	-6.69%	+4.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	0.98%	+1.59%

Volatility

DIVP vs. PBP - Volatility Comparison

Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF (DIVP) has a higher volatility of 2.49% compared to Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) at 0.90%. This indicates that DIVP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DIVP	PBP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.49%	0.90%	+1.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.14%	5.53%	+1.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.15%	6.87%	+3.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.78%	11.86%	-0.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.78%	13.66%	-1.88%

DIVP vs. PBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVP has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than PBP's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

DIVP vs. PBP - Dividend Comparison

DIVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, less than PBP's 11.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DIVP Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF	5.65%	6.06%	5.92%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	11.14%	11.12%	9.36%	3.35%	1.33%	6.21%	1.41%	5.04%	2.59%	10.86%	2.56%	6.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DIVP and PBP in my portfolio?

DIVP and PBP have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DIVP or PBP?

DIVP has higher volatility (2.49%) compared to PBP (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVP dropped -12.26% vs PBP's -43.43%.

Which ETF is better, DIVP or PBP?

On 1-year performance, PBP leads with 17.99% vs 15.53% for DIVP. On fees, PBP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PBP has been the lower-risk option at 0.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DIVP or PBP?

Over the 1-year period, PBP has performed better with a 17.99% return vs 15.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DIVP or PBP?

PBP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DIVP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DIVP or PBP?

PBP has the higher dividend yield at 11.14%, compared with 5.65% for DIVP.

What is the main difference between DIVP and PBP?

They also come from different issuers: Cullen and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DIVP and 0.29% for PBP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.