DIVO vs. QYLD
DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. DIVO is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DIVO returned 10.61%/yr vs 8.43%/yr for QYLD. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIVO charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.
Performance
DIVO vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIVO achieves a 5.53% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.88% return.
DIVO
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- YTD
- 5.53%
- 6M
- 5.82%
- 1Y
- 18.37%
- 3Y*
- 15.35%
- 5Y*
- 10.61%
- 10Y*
- —
QYLD
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 7.88%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 23.93%
- 3Y*
- 13.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
DIVO vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 5.53% | 17.40% | 16.22% | 6.95% | -1.46% | 22.87% | 12.40% | 24.90% | -3.18% | 21.41% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 7.88% | 9.28% | 19.35% | 22.77% | -19.08% | 10.41% | 8.72% | 22.69% | -3.07% | 18.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIVO and QYLD is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2016 | 0.57 |
The correlation between DIVO and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
DIVO vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIVO
QYLD
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
DIVO
QYLD
Industrials
DIVO
QYLD
Technology
DIVO
QYLD
Consumer Cyclical
DIVO
QYLD
Consumer Defensive
DIVO
QYLD
Energy
DIVO
QYLD
Healthcare
DIVO
QYLD
Basic Materials
DIVO
QYLD
Utilities
DIVO
QYLD
Communication Services
DIVO
QYLD
Real Estate
DIVO
-
QYLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIVO vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
DIVO
QYLD
DIVO vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIVO | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.63 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 4.84 | -1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.21 | 28.36 | -17.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIVO | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 2.80 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 0.58 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.59 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
DIVO vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVO drawdown since its inception was -30.04%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVO and QYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIVO | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.04% | -24.75% | -5.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.95% | -4.97% | -0.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.12% | -19.06% | +6.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.72% | -24.61% | +10.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | -0.06% | -0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.61% | -3.84% | +1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 0.85% | +0.79% |
Volatility
DIVO vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) has a higher volatility of 2.01% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.85%. This indicates that DIVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIVO | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.01% | 1.85% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.88% | 7.12% | -0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.97% | 8.58% | +0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.94% | 14.70% | -2.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 15.49% | -0.65% |
DIVO vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIVO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIVO vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
DIVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, less than QYLD's 11.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.42% | 6.44% | 4.70% | 4.67% | 4.76% | 4.79% | 4.91% | 8.16% | 5.27% | 3.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.46% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIVO and QYLD have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIVO has higher volatility (2.01%) compared to QYLD (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVO dropped -30.04% vs QYLD's -24.75%.
On 5-year performance, DIVO leads with 10.61% vs 8.43% for QYLD. On fees, DIVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIVO has performed better with a 10.61% return vs 8.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.
QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.46%, compared with 6.42% for DIVO.
DIVO is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for DIVO and 0.60% for QYLD.
QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIVO and QYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer