PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIVO vs. BATT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DIVO vs. BATT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DIVO vs. BATT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
2.19%17.40%16.22%6.95%-1.46%22.87%12.40%24.90%-4.40%
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
8.99%59.70%-13.93%-7.05%-32.25%16.52%44.43%-2.40%-42.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVO achieves a 2.19% return, which is significantly lower than BATT's 8.99% return.


DIVO

1D
0.18%
1M
-3.44%
YTD
2.19%
6M
5.30%
1Y
17.84%
3Y*
14.21%
5Y*
11.02%
10Y*

BATT

1D
1.01%
1M
-7.16%
YTD
8.99%
6M
16.65%
1Y
82.30%
3Y*
8.21%
5Y*
2.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DIVO vs. BATT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than BATT's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DIVO vs. BATT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVO
DIVO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
DIVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

BATT
BATT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
BATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATT Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
BATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATT Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVO vs. BATT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIVOBATTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.36

2.56

-1.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.99

2.99

-0.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.41

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

4.64

-2.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.07

17.14

-8.07

DIVO vs. BATT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVO Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the BATT Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVO and BATT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIVOBATTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

2.56

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

0.07

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

-0.05

+0.88

Correlation

The correlation between DIVO and BATT is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DIVO vs. BATT - Dividend Comparison

DIVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, more than BATT's 1.70% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
6.48%6.44%4.70%4.67%4.76%4.79%4.91%8.16%5.27%3.83%
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
1.70%1.85%3.17%3.23%4.14%2.32%0.21%3.22%0.89%0.00%

Drawdowns

DIVO vs. BATT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVO drawdown since its inception was -30.04%, smaller than the maximum BATT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVO and BATT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVOBATTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.04%

-69.38%

+39.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-17.58%

+8.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.72%

-61.98%

+48.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.96%

-15.47%

+11.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.62%

-35.40%

+32.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

4.87%

-2.92%

Volatility

DIVO vs. BATT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) is 3.58%, while Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) has a volatility of 12.38%. This indicates that DIVO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DIVOBATTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

12.38%

-8.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.01%

25.10%

-18.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.13%

32.28%

-19.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.93%

29.24%

-17.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.93%

30.55%

-15.62%