PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIVN vs. SEIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIVN vs. SEIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN) and SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF (SEIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVN achieves a 14.73% return, which is significantly lower than SEIV's 20.90% return.


DIVN

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.08%
6M
7.52%
YTD
14.73%
1Y
22.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.56%

SEIV

1D
1.08%
1M
4.15%
6M
17.50%
YTD
20.90%
1Y
42.78%
3Y*
25.70%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.52M$5.71M$2.75M
$9.14M$9.18M$6.19M

DIVN vs. SEIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DIVN
Horizon Dividend Income ETF
14.73%8.11%
SEIV
SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF
20.90%20.15%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVN and SEIV is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.62

The correlation between DIVN and SEIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIVN vs. SEIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DIVN
DIVN Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DIVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVN Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVN Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SEIV
SEIV Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SEIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEIV Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
SEIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEIV Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DIVN vs. SEIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN) and SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF (SEIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DIVNSEIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.61

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.06

6.19

-2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.43

22.94

-11.51

DIVN vs. SEIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVN Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is lower than the SEIV Sharpe Ratio of 3.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVN and SEIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DIVN vs. SEIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVN drawdown since its inception was -5.55%, smaller than the maximum SEIV drawdown of -18.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVN and SEIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVNSEIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.55%

-18.18%

+12.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.55%

-6.95%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

0.00%

-1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.35%

-3.42%

+2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

1.87%

+0.10%

Volatility

DIVN vs. SEIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN) is 3.04%, while SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF (SEIV) has a volatility of 3.44%. This indicates that DIVN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVNSEIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

3.44%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.52%

9.52%

-2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.36%

12.76%

-2.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.51%

16.54%

-6.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.51%

16.54%

-6.03%

DIVN vs. SEIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVN has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SEIV's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIVN vs. SEIV - Dividend Comparison

DIVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than SEIV's 1.43% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DIVN
Horizon Dividend Income ETF
3.70%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEIV
SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF
1.43%1.51%1.66%2.08%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIVN and SEIV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEIV has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to DIVN (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVN dropped -5.55% vs SEIV's -18.18%.

On 1-year performance, SEIV leads with 42.78% vs 22.46% for DIVN. On fees, SEIV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DIVN has been the lower-risk option at 3.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SEIV has performed better with a 42.78% return vs 22.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SEIV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for DIVN.

DIVN has the higher dividend yield at 3.70%, compared with 1.43% for SEIV.

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for DIVN and 0.15% for SEIV.

SEIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.37 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIVN and SEIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer