DIVL vs. KEAT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DIVL (Madison Dividend Value ETF) and KEAT (Keating Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIVL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Madison, while KEAT is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Keating. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DIVL returned 13.28% vs 19.10% for KEAT. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIVL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for KEAT.

Performance

DIVL vs. KEAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Dividend Value ETF (DIVL) and Keating Active ETF (KEAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVL achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly higher than KEAT's 5.02% return.

DIVL

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: -1.84%
• YTD: 7.33%
• 6M: 6.66%
• 1Y: 13.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KEAT

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -5.12%
• YTD: 5.02%
• 6M: 4.22%
• 1Y: 19.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVL vs. KEAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DIVL Madison Dividend Value ETF	7.33%	9.83%	4.63%
KEAT Keating Active ETF	5.02%	22.76%	3.10%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVL and KEAT is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024	0.64

The correlation between DIVL and KEAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DIVL vs. KEAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVL

DIVL Risk / Return Rank: 38
DIVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
DIVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
DIVL Omega Ratio Rank: 35
DIVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
DIVL Martin Ratio Rank: 38

KEAT

KEAT Risk / Return Rank: 51
KEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
KEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
KEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
KEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
KEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVL vs. KEAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Dividend Value ETF (DIVL) and Keating Active ETF (KEAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DIVL	KEAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	1.79	-0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	2.42	-0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.32	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	2.04	-0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.52	6.99	-1.47

DIVL vs. KEAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVL Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the KEAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVL and KEAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DIVL vs. KEAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVL drawdown since its inception was -14.06%, which is greater than KEAT's maximum drawdown of -9.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVL and KEAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	DIVL	KEAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.06%	-9.40%	-4.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.93%	-9.40%	+2.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.08%	-9.40%	+5.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.58%	-1.70%	-0.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	2.74%	-0.33%

Volatility

DIVL vs. KEAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Madison Dividend Value ETF (DIVL) is 3.06%, while Keating Active ETF (KEAT) has a volatility of 3.48%. This indicates that DIVL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DIVL	KEAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.06%	3.48%	-0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.94%	8.81%	-0.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.70%	10.73%	-0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.35%	10.41%	+1.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.35%	10.41%	+1.94%

DIVL vs. KEAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than KEAT's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

DIVL vs. KEAT - Dividend Comparison

DIVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than KEAT's 2.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DIVL Madison Dividend Value ETF	1.78%	1.80%	2.19%	1.01%
KEAT Keating Active ETF	2.34%	2.48%	1.72%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DIVL and KEAT in my portfolio?

DIVL and KEAT have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DIVL or KEAT?

KEAT has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to DIVL (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVL dropped -14.06% vs KEAT's -9.40%.

Which ETF is better, DIVL or KEAT?

On 1-year performance, KEAT leads with 19.10% vs 13.28% for DIVL. On fees, DIVL is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, DIVL has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DIVL or KEAT?

Over the 1-year period, KEAT has performed better with a 19.10% return vs 13.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DIVL or KEAT?

DIVL is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for KEAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DIVL or KEAT?

KEAT has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 1.78% for DIVL.

What is the main difference between DIVL and KEAT?

DIVL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while KEAT is Global Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Madison and Keating. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DIVL and 0.85% for KEAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KEAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.