DIVI vs. SIVR
DIVI (Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) and SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIVI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Dividend Enhanced Select Index, while SIVR is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DIVI returned 11.03%/yr vs 10.56%/yr for SIVR. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DIVI charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SIVR.
Performance
DIVI vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIVI achieves a 13.85% return, which is significantly higher than SIVR's -18.61% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DIVI having a 11.03% annualized return and SIVR not far behind at 10.56%.
DIVI
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- 6M
- 7.73%
- YTD
- 13.85%
- 1Y
- 28.83%
- 3Y*
- 17.85%
- 5Y*
- 13.71%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.08%
SIVR
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- -2.25%
- 6M
- -30.49%
- YTD
- -18.61%
- 1Y
- 57.47%
- 3Y*
- 33.21%
- 5Y*
- 17.49%
- 10Y*
- 10.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.45%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.61M | $6.51M | $8.10M | |
| $49.50M | $48.83M | $86.59M |
DIVI vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 13.85% | 34.86% | 1.77% | 18.97% | -1.21% | 16.95% | 1.29% | 22.98% | -6.73% | 13.65% |
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | -18.61% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | -12.33% | 47.52% | 15.17% | -8.96% | 5.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIVI and SIVR is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2016 | 0.25 |
Over the past year, DIVI and SIVR have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.25, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIVI vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank
DIVI
SIVR
DIVI vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIVI | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.22 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 1.10 | +1.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.77 | 2.11 | +8.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIVI vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVI drawdown since its inception was -27.76%, smaller than the maximum SIVR drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVI and SIVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIVI | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.76% | -75.85% | +48.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.54% | -52.27% | +41.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.58% | -52.27% | +37.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.53% | -52.27% | +33.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.76% | -52.27% | +24.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -50.35% | +49.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.59% | -47.84% | +44.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 27.28% | -24.60% |
Volatility
DIVI vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) is 4.47%, while abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a volatility of 11.28%. This indicates that DIVI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIVI | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 11.28% | -6.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.31% | 55.47% | -42.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.41% | 61.33% | -45.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.48% | 37.00% | -21.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 32.26% | -15.92% |
DIVI vs. SIVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIVI has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SIVR's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIVI vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison
DIVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, while SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 3.55% | 3.76% | 4.39% | 3.17% | 6.03% | 2.77% | 8.04% | 1.61% | 5.67% | 5.22% | 11.56% |
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIVI and SIVR have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIVR has higher volatility (11.28%) compared to DIVI (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVI dropped -27.76% vs SIVR's -75.85%.
On 10-year performance, DIVI leads with 11.03% vs 10.56% for SIVR. On fees, DIVI is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DIVI has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DIVI has performed better with a 11.03% return vs 10.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVI is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SIVR.
DIVI has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 0.00% for SIVR.
DIVI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SIVR is Silver. DIVI tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Dividend Enhanced Select Index, while SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for DIVI and 0.30% for SIVR.
DIVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIVI and SIVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer