PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIVI vs. RODM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIVI vs. RODM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DIVI having a 10.38% return and RODM slightly lower at 9.95%. Over the past 10 years, DIVI has outperformed RODM with an annualized return of 11.69%, while RODM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.29% annualized return.


DIVI

1D
-0.30%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
10.38%
6M
9.84%
1Y
24.93%
3Y*
18.13%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
11.69%

RODM

1D
-0.18%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
9.95%
6M
9.50%
1Y
22.82%
3Y*
20.09%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
9.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVI vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIVI
Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
10.38%34.86%1.77%18.97%-1.21%16.95%1.29%22.98%-6.73%13.65%
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
9.95%34.42%8.02%15.76%-14.54%11.11%-0.62%17.15%-9.97%25.14%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVI and RODM is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2016

0.81

The correlation between DIVI and RODM shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DIVI vs. RODM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DIVI
RODM

Financial Services

29.7%
26.6%

Industrials

17.3%
16.7%

Technology

12.2%
10.5%

Healthcare

7.3%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
4.0%

Basic Materials

5.2%
6.4%

Utilities

4.8%
4.8%

Communication Services

4.1%
5.5%

Energy

3.2%
6.3%

Real Estate

2.1%
3.5%

Financial Services

DIVI
29.7%
RODM
26.6%

Industrials

DIVI
17.3%
RODM
16.7%

Technology

DIVI
12.2%
RODM
10.5%

Healthcare

DIVI
7.3%
RODM
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DIVI
7.1%
RODM
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

DIVI
6.4%
RODM
4.0%

Basic Materials

DIVI
5.2%
RODM
6.4%

Utilities

DIVI
4.8%
RODM
4.8%

Communication Services

DIVI
4.1%
RODM
5.5%

Energy

DIVI
3.2%
RODM
6.3%

Real Estate

DIVI
2.1%
RODM
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIVI vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVI
DIVI Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
DIVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVI Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVI Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

RODM
RODM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
RODM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RODM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
RODM Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
RODM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
RODM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVI vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DIVIRODMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.38

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

3.23

-0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.13

12.73

-3.60

DIVI vs. RODM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVI Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the RODM Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVI and RODM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DIVI vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVI drawdown since its inception was -27.76%, smaller than the maximum RODM drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVI and RODM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVIRODMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.76%

-35.98%

+8.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.54%

-7.10%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.58%

-10.58%

-4.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.53%

-28.85%

+10.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.76%

-35.98%

+8.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.30%

-2.34%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.62%

-6.35%

+2.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

1.80%

+0.94%

Volatility

DIVI vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison

Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) at 3.21%. This indicates that DIVI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RODM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVIRODMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

3.21%

+1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.95%

8.76%

+4.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.32%

10.94%

+4.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

13.45%

+1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.36%

15.07%

+1.29%

DIVI vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVI has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIVI vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison

DIVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than RODM's 2.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIVI
Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
2.06%3.76%4.39%3.17%6.03%2.77%8.04%1.61%5.67%5.22%11.56%0.00%
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
2.83%3.11%4.09%4.42%3.81%4.41%2.82%2.82%2.03%2.24%3.19%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIVI and RODM have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVI has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to RODM (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVI dropped -27.76% vs RODM's -35.98%.

On 10-year performance, DIVI leads with 11.69% vs 9.29% for RODM. On fees, DIVI is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DIVI has performed better with a 11.69% return vs 9.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVI is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for RODM.

RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 2.06% for DIVI.

DIVI tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Dividend Enhanced Select Index, while RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for DIVI and 0.29% for RODM.

RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIVI and RODM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer