PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIVI vs. FLJH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIVI vs. FLJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVI achieves a 10.71% return, which is significantly lower than FLJH's 20.28% return.


DIVI

1D
-2.01%
1M
-0.05%
YTD
10.71%
6M
10.37%
1Y
26.90%
3Y*
18.25%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
11.73%

FLJH

1D
-4.00%
1M
2.70%
YTD
20.28%
6M
20.23%
1Y
46.99%
3Y*
27.12%
5Y*
20.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVI vs. FLJH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIVI
Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
10.71%34.86%1.77%18.97%-1.21%16.95%1.29%22.98%-6.73%0.62%
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
20.28%25.26%25.89%36.02%-2.75%12.68%10.65%20.34%-14.66%1.26%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVI and FLJH is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.65

The correlation between DIVI and FLJH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

DIVI vs. FLJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DIVI
FLJH

Financial Services

29.7%
15.8%

Industrials

17.3%
25.2%

Technology

12.2%
19.4%

Healthcare

7.3%
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
4.0%

Basic Materials

5.2%
4.4%

Utilities

4.8%
1.2%

Communication Services

4.1%
8.0%

Energy

3.2%
0.9%

Real Estate

2.1%
3.0%

Financial Services

DIVI
29.7%
FLJH
15.8%

Industrials

DIVI
17.3%
FLJH
25.2%

Technology

DIVI
12.2%
FLJH
19.4%

Healthcare

DIVI
7.3%
FLJH
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DIVI
7.1%
FLJH
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

DIVI
6.4%
FLJH
4.0%

Basic Materials

DIVI
5.2%
FLJH
4.4%

Utilities

DIVI
4.8%
FLJH
1.2%

Communication Services

DIVI
4.1%
FLJH
8.0%

Energy

DIVI
3.2%
FLJH
0.9%

Real Estate

DIVI
2.1%
FLJH
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIVI vs. FLJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVI
DIVI Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
DIVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVI Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVI Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FLJH
FLJH Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FLJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJH Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJH Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVI vs. FLJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DIVIFLJHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.46

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

4.37

-1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.86

16.90

-7.03

DIVI vs. FLJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVI Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the FLJH Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVI and FLJH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DIVI vs. FLJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVI drawdown since its inception was -27.76%, smaller than the maximum FLJH drawdown of -31.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVI and FLJH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVIFLJHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.76%

-31.51%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.54%

-10.80%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.58%

-20.39%

+5.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.53%

-20.39%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-4.00%

+1.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.62%

-5.29%

+1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

2.79%

-0.06%

Volatility

DIVI vs. FLJH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) is 5.19%, while Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) has a volatility of 7.15%. This indicates that DIVI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVIFLJHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

7.15%

-1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.95%

14.83%

-1.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.34%

18.98%

-3.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.43%

18.71%

-3.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.36%

19.89%

-3.53%

DIVI vs. FLJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DIVI and FLJH have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DIVI vs. FLJH - Dividend Comparison

DIVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, more than FLJH's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DIVI
Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
2.05%3.76%4.39%3.17%6.03%2.77%8.04%1.61%5.67%5.22%11.56%
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
1.86%3.90%5.06%25.59%26.67%1.29%0.00%0.00%5.92%0.10%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIVI and FLJH have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLJH has higher volatility (7.15%) compared to DIVI (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVI dropped -27.76% vs FLJH's -31.51%.

On 5-year performance, FLJH leads with 20.87% vs 13.30% for DIVI. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, DIVI has been the lower-risk option at 5.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLJH has performed better with a 20.87% return vs 13.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVI and FLJH have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

DIVI has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 1.86% for FLJH.

DIVI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FLJH is Japan Equities. DIVI tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Dividend Enhanced Select Index, while FLJH tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index.

FLJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIVI and FLJH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer