DIVG vs. DGRW
DIVG (Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF) and DGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DIVG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while DGRW is a Dividend fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DIVG returned 20.94% vs 20.79% for DGRW. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIVG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DGRW.
Performance
DIVG vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIVG achieves a 10.58% return, which is significantly higher than DGRW's 9.10% return.
DIVG
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 10.58%
- 6M
- 10.78%
- 1Y
- 20.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGRW
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 4.06%
- YTD
- 9.10%
- 6M
- 8.62%
- 1Y
- 20.79%
- 3Y*
- 16.64%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 14.15%
DIVG vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVG Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF | 10.58% | 11.31% | 16.60% | 5.71% |
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 9.10% | 12.17% | 16.98% | 4.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIVG and DGRW is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023 | 0.71 |
The correlation between DIVG and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
DIVG vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIVG
DGRW
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Energy
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
DIVG
DGRW
Consumer Defensive
DIVG
DGRW
Utilities
DIVG
DGRW
Real Estate
DIVG
DGRW
-
Energy
DIVG
DGRW
Technology
DIVG
DGRW
Industrials
DIVG
DGRW
Basic Materials
DIVG
DGRW
Healthcare
DIVG
DGRW
Communication Services
DIVG
DGRW
Consumer Cyclical
DIVG
DGRW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIVG vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank
DIVG
DGRW
DIVG vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF (DIVG) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIVG | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.39 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.10 | 2.52 | +1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.12 | 11.03 | +2.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIVG | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 2.12 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.39 | 0.86 | +0.54 |
Drawdowns
DIVG vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVG drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, smaller than the maximum DGRW drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVG and DGRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIVG | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.95% | -32.04% | +17.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.13% | -8.30% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | -0.83% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.29% | -3.01% | +0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 1.89% | -0.29% |
Volatility
DIVG vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF (DIVG) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) have volatilities of 2.53% and 2.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIVG | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.53% | 2.47% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.33% | 7.64% | -0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.66% | 9.88% | +0.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.19% | 13.97% | -0.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.19% | 16.21% | -3.02% |
DIVG vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIVG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIVG vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison
DIVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, more than DGRW's 1.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.27% | 1.43% | 1.55% | 1.74% | 2.15% | 1.78% | 1.93% | 2.20% | 2.42% | 1.71% | 2.13% | 2.18% |
DIVG Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF | 3.10% | 3.15% | 4.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIVG and DGRW have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIVG has higher volatility (2.53%) compared to DGRW (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVG dropped -14.95% vs DGRW's -32.04%.
On 1-year performance, DIVG leads with 20.94% vs 20.79% for DGRW. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DIVG has performed better with a 20.94% return vs 20.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for DIVG.
DIVG has the higher dividend yield at 3.10%, compared with 1.27% for DGRW.
DIVG is categorized as S&P 500, while DGRW is Dividend. DIVG tracks S&P 500 High Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DIVG and 0.28% for DGRW.
DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIVG and DGRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer