DIVE vs. SCDL
DIVE (Dana Concentrated Dividend ETF) and SCDL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - DIVE is a Dividend fund actively managed by Dana, while SCDL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 (200%). DIVE is actively managed, while SCDL is passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIVE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SCDL.
Performance
DIVE vs. SCDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIVE achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than SCDL's 33.23% return.
DIVE
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- 0.47%
- 6M
- -0.79%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCDL
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -5.51%
- YTD
- 33.23%
- 6M
- 31.30%
- 1Y
- 44.06%
- 3Y*
- 21.63%
- 5Y*
- 9.68%
- 10Y*
- —
DIVE vs. SCDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DIVE Dana Concentrated Dividend ETF | 0.47% | 1.94% |
SCDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN | 33.23% | 3.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIVE and SCDL is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIVE vs. SCDL — Risk / Return Rank
DIVE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCDL
DIVE vs. SCDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dana Concentrated Dividend ETF (DIVE) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIVE | SCDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.35 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.73 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIVE vs. SCDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVE drawdown since its inception was -11.45%, smaller than the maximum SCDL drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVE and SCDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIVE | SCDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.45% | -34.87% | +23.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -32.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.27% | -5.51% | +1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.15% | -11.86% | +8.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.12% | — |
Volatility
DIVE vs. SCDL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIVE | SCDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.00% | 21.70% | -8.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.00% | 28.97% | -15.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.00% | 28.80% | -15.80% |
DIVE vs. SCDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIVE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than SCDL's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIVE vs. SCDL - Dividend Comparison
DIVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, while SCDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DIVE Dana Concentrated Dividend ETF | 0.98% | 0.66% |
SCDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIVE and SCDL have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DIVE is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DIVE is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SCDL.
DIVE has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for SCDL.
DIVE is categorized as Dividend, while SCDL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dana and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DIVE and 0.95% for SCDL.
Find the right allocation for DIVE and SCDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer