PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIVB vs. JPUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIVB vs. JPUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Dividend and Buyback ETF (DIVB) and JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVB achieves a 16.10% return, which is significantly higher than JPUS's 10.87% return.


DIVB

1D
0.09%
1M
5.36%
YTD
16.10%
6M
16.58%
1Y
27.52%
3Y*
21.21%
5Y*
11.98%
10Y*

JPUS

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.86%
YTD
10.87%
6M
11.70%
1Y
19.87%
3Y*
15.41%
5Y*
9.35%
10Y*
11.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVB vs. JPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIVB
iShares U.S. Dividend and Buyback ETF
16.10%15.09%18.59%13.27%-10.51%31.29%10.78%32.72%-8.16%5.95%
JPUS
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
10.87%11.18%13.48%10.98%-8.47%29.09%7.54%25.50%-6.14%3.96%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVB and JPUS is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017

0.92

The correlation between DIVB and JPUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIVB vs. JPUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVB
DIVB Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DIVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVB Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVB Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

JPUS
JPUS Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
JPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
JPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVB vs. JPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Dividend and Buyback ETF (DIVB) and JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIVBJPUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.33

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.05

2.89

+1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.75

11.60

+2.15

DIVB vs. JPUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVB Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the JPUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVB and JPUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIVBJPUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

1.92

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.65

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.72

+0.03

Drawdowns

DIVB vs. JPUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVB drawdown since its inception was -36.93%, roughly equal to the maximum JPUS drawdown of -38.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVB and JPUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVBJPUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.93%

-38.69%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.82%

-6.90%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.45%

-15.96%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.08%

-19.04%

-2.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.98%

-1.02%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-3.82%

-1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.72%

+0.29%

Volatility

DIVB vs. JPUS - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Dividend and Buyback ETF (DIVB) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) at 2.55%. This indicates that DIVB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVBJPUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

2.55%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.68%

7.61%

+1.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.53%

10.40%

+1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.26%

14.51%

+0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.38%

16.76%

+1.62%

DIVB vs. JPUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than JPUS's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DIVB vs. JPUS - Dividend Comparison

DIVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, more than JPUS's 2.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIVB
iShares U.S. Dividend and Buyback ETF
2.21%2.50%2.61%3.18%2.02%1.63%2.08%2.07%2.52%0.37%0.00%0.00%
JPUS
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
2.06%2.27%2.12%2.26%2.35%1.67%1.94%2.09%2.16%1.25%0.77%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIVB and JPUS have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVB has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to JPUS (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVB dropped -36.93% vs JPUS's -38.69%.

On 5-year performance, DIVB leads with 11.98% vs 9.35% for JPUS. On fees, JPUS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, JPUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DIVB has performed better with a 11.98% return vs 9.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPUS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DIVB.

DIVB has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 2.06% for JPUS.

DIVB tracks Morningstar US Dividend and Buyback Index, while JPUS tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DIVB and 0.18% for JPUS.

DIVB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIVB and JPUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer