DIVB vs. FCGSX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares U.S. Dividend and Buyback ETF (DIVB) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX).
DIVB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Dividend and Buyback Index. It was launched on Nov 7, 2017. FCGSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 7, 2013.
Performance
DIVB vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DIVB vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVB iShares U.S. Dividend and Buyback ETF | 2.14% | 15.09% | 18.59% | 13.27% | -10.51% | 31.29% | 10.78% | 32.72% | -8.16% | 5.95% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | -6.64% | 25.52% | 38.00% | 45.97% | -32.15% | 25.13% | 70.01% | 39.75% | -4.03% | 2.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIVB achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly higher than FCGSX's -6.64% return.
DIVB
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -3.90%
- YTD
- 2.14%
- 6M
- 4.65%
- 1Y
- 14.11%
- 3Y*
- 16.30%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- —
FCGSX
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -8.19%
- YTD
- -6.64%
- 6M
- -2.02%
- 1Y
- 33.82%
- 3Y*
- 27.05%
- 5Y*
- 14.28%
- 10Y*
- 21.43%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DIVB vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIVB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
DIVB vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank
DIVB
FCGSX
DIVB vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Dividend and Buyback ETF (DIVB) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIVB | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 1.40 | -0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 2.02 | -0.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.29 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 2.25 | -1.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.30 | 10.23 | -4.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIVB | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 1.40 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.61 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.87 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between DIVB and FCGSX is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DIVB vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison
DIVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than FCGSX's 11.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVB iShares U.S. Dividend and Buyback ETF | 2.51% | 2.50% | 2.61% | 3.18% | 2.02% | 1.63% | 2.08% | 2.07% | 2.52% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | 11.22% | 10.48% | 12.49% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 38.65% | 31.99% | 11.06% | 13.21% | 10.51% | 2.44% | 0.25% |
Drawdowns
DIVB vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVB drawdown since its inception was -36.93%, roughly equal to the maximum FCGSX drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVB and FCGSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIVB | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.93% | -38.77% | +1.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.59% | -13.10% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.08% | -38.77% | +17.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.96% | -10.42% | +5.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -7.05% | +1.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 2.88% | +0.03% |
Volatility
DIVB vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Dividend and Buyback ETF (DIVB) is 3.67%, while Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that DIVB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DIVB | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.67% | 6.66% | -2.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.49% | 13.74% | -5.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.02% | 23.80% | -7.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.21% | 23.62% | -8.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.49% | 23.15% | -4.66% |