DIV vs. XLF
DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) and XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index, while XLF is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DIV returned 4.30%/yr vs 13.33%/yr for XLF. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIV charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLF.
Performance
DIV vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIV achieves a 14.48% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's -2.11% return. Over the past 10 years, DIV has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of 4.30%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.33% annualized return.
DIV
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 14.48%
- 6M
- 13.33%
- 1Y
- 16.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.89%
- 5Y*
- 5.31%
- 10Y*
- 4.30%
XLF
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- -2.11%
- 6M
- -2.09%
- 1Y
- 8.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 9.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.33%
DIV vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 14.48% | 3.10% | 11.27% | -1.73% | -3.92% | 30.60% | -22.85% | 14.50% | -6.60% | 9.90% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | -2.11% | 14.90% | 30.56% | 12.03% | -10.59% | 34.80% | -1.74% | 31.88% | -13.06% | 22.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIV and XLF is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2013 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DIV and XLF has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DIV vs. XLF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIV
XLF
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Energy
DIV
XLF
-
Real Estate
DIV
XLF
-
Utilities
DIV
XLF
-
Industrials
DIV
XLF
Consumer Defensive
DIV
XLF
-
Communication Services
DIV
XLF
-
Basic Materials
DIV
XLF
-
Financial Services
DIV
XLF
Consumer Cyclical
DIV
XLF
-
Healthcare
DIV
XLF
-
Technology
DIV
-
XLF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIV vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank
DIV
XLF
DIV vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIV | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.08 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 0.42 | +2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.43 | 1.08 | +7.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIV vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIV drawdown since its inception was -52.74%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIV and XLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIV | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.74% | -82.69% | +29.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.23% | -14.79% | +9.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.33% | -15.54% | +3.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.14% | -25.81% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.74% | -42.86% | -9.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -4.94% | +4.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -20.01% | +13.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 5.76% | -3.88% |
Volatility
DIV vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) is 3.07%, while State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that DIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIV | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 4.23% | -1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.08% | 11.26% | -4.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.32% | 14.69% | -4.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.69% | 18.66% | -4.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 22.17% | -4.19% |
DIV vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIV vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
DIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, more than XLF's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 6.61% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.49% | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 21.10% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIV and XLF have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLF has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to DIV (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIV dropped -52.74% vs XLF's -82.69%.
On 10-year performance, XLF leads with 13.33% vs 4.30% for DIV. On fees, XLF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLF has performed better with a 13.33% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DIV.
DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 1.49% for XLF.
DIV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while XLF is Financials Equities. DIV tracks Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index, while XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DIV and 0.08% for XLF.
DIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIV and XLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer