DIV vs. URA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) and URA (Global X Uranium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIV is a Dividend fund tracking the Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index, while URA is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DIV returned 3.95%/yr vs 17.12%/yr for URA. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DIV charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for URA.

Performance

DIV vs. URA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIV achieves a 11.63% return, which is significantly lower than URA's 17.93% return. Over the past 10 years, DIV has underperformed URA with an annualized return of 3.95%, while URA has yielded a comparatively higher 17.12% annualized return.

DIV

• 1D: -1.38%
• 1M: -1.56%
• YTD: 11.63%
• 6M: 10.20%
• 1Y: 14.38%
• 3Y*: 11.72%
• 5Y*: 5.02%
• 10Y*: 3.95%

URA

• 1D: -5.67%
• 1M: -8.00%
• YTD: 17.93%
• 6M: 13.25%
• 1Y: 61.26%
• 3Y*: 39.27%
• 5Y*: 21.39%
• 10Y*: 17.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIV vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF	11.63%	3.10%	11.27%	-1.73%	-3.92%	30.60%	-22.85%	14.50%	-6.60%	9.90%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	17.93%	67.18%	-0.58%	46.25%	-11.32%	57.57%	41.33%	-3.54%	-22.11%	19.36%

Correlation

The correlation between DIV and URA is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2013	0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between DIV and URA has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DIV vs. URA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DIV	URA
Energy	21.5%	57.0%
Real Estate	19.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	13.4%	-
Utilities	12.0%	9.4%
Industrials	11.5%	21.9%
Communication Services	6.3%	-
Basic Materials	4.6%	5.0%
Financial Services	3.9%	-
Healthcare	3.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.5%	-
Technology	-	0.9%

Return for Risk

DIV vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIV

DIV Risk / Return Rank: 42
DIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
DIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
DIV Omega Ratio Rank: 35
DIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
DIV Martin Ratio Rank: 46

URA

URA Risk / Return Rank: 34
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 31
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIV vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DIV	URA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	1.23	+0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	1.86	+0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.22	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.76	2.17	+0.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.79	4.58	+3.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DIV vs. URA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the URA Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIV and URA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DIV	URA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.40	1.23	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	0.49	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22	0.46	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	-0.05	+0.32

Drawdowns

DIV vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIV drawdown since its inception was -52.74%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIV and URA.

Drawdown Indicators

	DIV	URA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.74%	-93.54%	+40.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.23%	-28.43%	+23.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.33%	-37.81%	+25.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.14%	-37.90%	+16.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.74%	-61.45%	+8.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.20%	-42.81%	+39.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.03%	-75.01%	+67.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	13.40%	-11.55%

Volatility

DIV vs. URA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) is 3.18%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 15.94%. This indicates that DIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DIV	URA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.18%	15.94%	-12.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.11%	38.29%	-31.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.36%	50.19%	-39.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.68%	43.62%	-29.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.98%	37.73%	-19.75%

DIV vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

DIV vs. URA - Dividend Comparison

DIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than URA's 4.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF	7.36%	7.30%	5.74%	7.13%	6.62%	5.24%	8.01%	7.65%	7.08%	5.92%	6.78%	8.44%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	4.14%	4.88%	2.86%	6.07%	0.76%	5.84%	1.69%	1.66%	0.44%	2.03%	7.28%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DIV and URA in my portfolio?

DIV and URA have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DIV or URA?

URA has higher volatility (15.94%) compared to DIV (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIV dropped -52.74% vs URA's -93.54%.

Which ETF is better, DIV or URA?

On 10-year performance, URA leads with 17.12% vs 3.95% for DIV. On fees, DIV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DIV or URA?

Over the 10-year period, URA has performed better with a 17.12% return vs 3.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DIV or URA?

DIV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DIV or URA?

DIV has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 4.14% for URA.

What is the main difference between DIV and URA?

DIV is categorized as Dividend, while URA is Commodity Producers Equities. DIV tracks Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index, while URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DIV and 0.69% for URA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.