DIV vs. IVOV
DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) and IVOV (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - DIV tracks the Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index while IVOV tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DIV returned 4.14%/yr vs 10.85%/yr for IVOV. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIV charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IVOV.
Performance
DIV vs. IVOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIV achieves a 13.39% return, which is significantly higher than IVOV's 10.60% return. Over the past 10 years, DIV has underperformed IVOV with an annualized return of 4.14%, while IVOV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.85% annualized return.
DIV
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- YTD
- 13.39%
- 6M
- 13.87%
- 1Y
- 15.53%
- 3Y*
- 12.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.62%
- 10Y*
- 4.14%
IVOV
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 6M
- 8.95%
- 1Y
- 20.62%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 10.85%
DIV vs. IVOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 13.39% | 3.10% | 11.27% | -1.73% | -3.92% | 30.60% | -22.85% | 14.50% | -6.60% | 9.90% |
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 10.60% | 7.61% | 11.53% | 15.38% | -7.20% | 30.50% | 3.70% | 25.91% | -12.13% | 12.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIV and IVOV is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2013 | 0.77 |
The correlation between DIV and IVOV shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DIV vs. IVOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIV
IVOV
Energy
Real Estate
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Technology
-
Energy
DIV
IVOV
Real Estate
DIV
IVOV
Industrials
DIV
IVOV
Utilities
DIV
IVOV
Consumer Defensive
DIV
IVOV
Communication Services
DIV
IVOV
Basic Materials
DIV
IVOV
Financial Services
DIV
IVOV
Consumer Cyclical
DIV
IVOV
Healthcare
DIV
IVOV
Technology
DIV
-
IVOV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIV vs. IVOV — Risk / Return Rank
DIV
IVOV
DIV vs. IVOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIV | IVOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.24 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 1.96 | +1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.09 | 6.74 | +1.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIV vs. IVOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIV drawdown since its inception was -52.74%, which is greater than IVOV's maximum drawdown of -45.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIV and IVOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIV | IVOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.74% | -45.99% | -6.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.23% | -10.58% | +5.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.33% | -22.61% | +10.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.14% | -22.61% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.74% | -45.99% | -6.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | -1.21% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -5.41% | -1.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 3.07% | -1.15% |
Volatility
DIV vs. IVOV - Volatility Comparison
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) have volatilities of 3.68% and 3.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIV | IVOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 3.76% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.54% | 10.73% | -3.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.64% | 15.33% | -4.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.69% | 19.43% | -5.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 21.70% | -3.70% |
DIV vs. IVOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOV's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIV vs. IVOV - Dividend Comparison
DIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.77%, more than IVOV's 1.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 6.77% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 1.65% | 1.82% | 1.74% | 1.52% | 1.97% | 1.78% | 2.42% | 1.75% | 1.87% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIV and IVOV have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVOV has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to DIV (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIV dropped -52.74% vs IVOV's -45.99%.
On 10-year performance, IVOV leads with 10.85% vs 4.14% for DIV. On fees, IVOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVOV has performed better with a 10.85% return vs 4.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DIV.
DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.77%, compared with 1.65% for IVOV.
DIV tracks Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index, while IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DIV and 0.10% for IVOV.
DIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIV and IVOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer