PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIV vs. FDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIV vs. FDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIV achieves a 11.63% return, which is significantly higher than FDIV's 0.72% return. Over the past 10 years, DIV has outperformed FDIV with an annualized return of 3.95%, while FDIV has yielded a comparatively lower -2.13% annualized return.


DIV

1D
-1.38%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
11.63%
6M
10.20%
1Y
14.38%
3Y*
11.72%
5Y*
5.02%
10Y*
3.95%

FDIV

1D
-0.85%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
0.72%
6M
1.52%
1Y
7.68%
3Y*
-12.10%
5Y*
-8.67%
10Y*
-2.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIV vs. FDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIV
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
11.63%3.10%11.27%-1.73%-3.92%30.60%-22.85%14.50%-6.60%9.90%
FDIV
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF
0.72%2.95%-37.35%6.78%-9.97%10.20%-2.84%15.78%-5.04%6.19%

Correlation

The correlation between DIV and FDIV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2014

0.54

The correlation between DIV and FDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DIV vs. FDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DIV
FDIV

Energy

21.5%
3.0%

Real Estate

19.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

13.4%
9.0%

Utilities

12.0%
4.2%

Industrials

11.5%
24.9%

Communication Services

6.3%
3.0%

Basic Materials

4.6%
4.0%

Financial Services

3.9%
20.0%

Healthcare

3.6%
16.2%

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%
11.0%

Technology

-

8.9%

Energy

DIV
21.5%
FDIV
3.0%

Real Estate

DIV
19.8%
FDIV

-

Consumer Defensive

DIV
13.4%
FDIV
9.0%

Utilities

DIV
12.0%
FDIV
4.2%

Industrials

DIV
11.5%
FDIV
24.9%

Communication Services

DIV
6.3%
FDIV
3.0%

Basic Materials

DIV
4.6%
FDIV
4.0%

Financial Services

DIV
3.9%
FDIV
20.0%

Healthcare

DIV
3.6%
FDIV
16.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DIV
3.5%
FDIV
11.0%

Technology

DIV

-

FDIV
8.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIV vs. FDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIV
DIV Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
DIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
DIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIV Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FDIV
FDIV Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIV vs. FDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIVFDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.11

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

0.96

+1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.79

2.56

+5.23

DIV vs. FDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is higher than the FDIV Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIV and FDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIVFDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

0.61

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

-0.42

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

-0.12

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

-0.08

+0.35

Drawdowns

DIV vs. FDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIV drawdown since its inception was -52.74%, which is greater than FDIV's maximum drawdown of -47.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIV and FDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVFDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.74%

-47.90%

-4.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.23%

-8.01%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.33%

-45.64%

+33.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.14%

-47.90%

+26.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.74%

-47.90%

-4.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.20%

-38.05%

+34.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.03%

-11.15%

+4.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

3.01%

-1.16%

Volatility

DIV vs. FDIV - Volatility Comparison

Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) has a higher volatility of 3.18% compared to MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) at 2.99%. This indicates that DIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVFDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

2.99%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.11%

8.57%

-1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.36%

12.78%

-2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.68%

20.81%

-7.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.98%

17.54%

+0.44%

DIV vs. FDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIV's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIV vs. FDIV - Dividend Comparison

DIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than FDIV's 2.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIV
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
7.36%7.30%5.74%7.13%6.62%5.24%8.01%7.65%7.08%5.92%6.78%8.44%
FDIV
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF
2.89%2.95%4.12%4.63%3.81%3.79%4.17%3.93%5.13%3.81%3.84%4.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIV and FDIV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIV has higher volatility (3.18%) compared to FDIV (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIV dropped -52.74% vs FDIV's -47.90%.

On 10-year performance, DIV leads with 3.95% vs -2.13% for FDIV. On fees, FDIV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DIV has performed better with a 3.95% return vs -2.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDIV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DIV.

DIV has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 2.89% for FDIV.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and MarketDesk. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DIV and 0.35% for FDIV.

DIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIV and FDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer