DIV vs. AMZA
DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) and AMZA (InfraCap MLP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIV is a Dividend fund tracking the Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index, while AMZA is a MLPs fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners. DIV is passively managed, while AMZA is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, DIV returned 3.95%/yr vs 4.86%/yr for AMZA. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIV charges 0.45%/yr vs 2.01%/yr for AMZA.
Performance
DIV vs. AMZA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIV achieves a 11.63% return, which is significantly lower than AMZA's 22.22% return. Over the past 10 years, DIV has underperformed AMZA with an annualized return of 3.95%, while AMZA has yielded a comparatively higher 4.86% annualized return.
DIV
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- YTD
- 11.63%
- 6M
- 10.20%
- 1Y
- 14.38%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 5.02%
- 10Y*
- 3.95%
AMZA
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- 22.22%
- 6M
- 20.41%
- 1Y
- 17.55%
- 3Y*
- 22.02%
- 5Y*
- 19.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.86%
DIV vs. AMZA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 11.63% | 3.10% | 11.27% | -1.73% | -3.92% | 30.60% | -22.85% | 14.50% | -6.60% | 9.90% |
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 22.22% | 0.17% | 30.90% | 23.35% | 33.20% | 51.22% | -49.25% | 6.27% | -26.78% | -6.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIV and AMZA is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2014 | 0.60 |
The correlation between DIV and AMZA shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DIV vs. AMZA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIV
AMZA
Energy
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
-
Energy
DIV
AMZA
Real Estate
DIV
AMZA
-
Consumer Defensive
DIV
AMZA
-
Utilities
DIV
AMZA
Industrials
DIV
AMZA
-
Communication Services
DIV
AMZA
-
Basic Materials
DIV
AMZA
-
Financial Services
DIV
AMZA
-
Healthcare
DIV
AMZA
-
Consumer Cyclical
DIV
AMZA
-
Technology
DIV
-
AMZA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIV vs. AMZA — Risk / Return Rank
DIV
AMZA
DIV vs. AMZA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIV | AMZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.17 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 1.45 | +1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.79 | 3.65 | +4.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIV | AMZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 1.00 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.76 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.13 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | -0.02 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
DIV vs. AMZA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIV drawdown since its inception was -52.74%, smaller than the maximum AMZA drawdown of -91.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIV and AMZA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIV | AMZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.74% | -91.46% | +38.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.23% | -12.16% | +6.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.33% | -18.56% | +6.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.14% | -25.15% | +4.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.74% | -86.84% | +34.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.20% | -10.19% | +6.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -45.02% | +37.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 4.82% | -2.97% |
Volatility
DIV vs. AMZA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) is 3.18%, while InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) has a volatility of 5.80%. This indicates that DIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIV | AMZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 5.80% | -2.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.11% | 13.40% | -6.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.36% | 17.72% | -7.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.68% | 25.84% | -12.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 37.25% | -19.27% |
DIV vs. AMZA - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZA's 2.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIV vs. AMZA - Dividend Comparison
DIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, less than AMZA's 8.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 8.02% | 8.81% | 7.29% | 9.40% | 7.65% | 10.24% | 22.13% | 19.47% | 34.46% | 24.16% | 18.36% | 18.21% |
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 7.36% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIV and AMZA have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMZA has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to DIV (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIV dropped -52.74% vs AMZA's -91.46%.
On 10-year performance, AMZA leads with 4.86% vs 3.95% for DIV. On fees, DIV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, AMZA has performed better with a 4.86% return vs 3.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 2.01% for AMZA.
AMZA has the higher dividend yield at 8.02%, compared with 7.36% for DIV.
DIV is categorized as Dividend, while AMZA is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DIV and 2.01% for AMZA.
DIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIV and AMZA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer