PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIV vs. AMZA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIV vs. AMZA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIV achieves a 17.66% return, which is significantly lower than AMZA's 30.46% return. Over the past 10 years, DIV has underperformed AMZA with an annualized return of 4.23%, while AMZA has yielded a comparatively higher 5.46% annualized return.


DIV

1D
-0.48%
1M
2.37%
6M
9.80%
YTD
17.66%
1Y
21.05%
3Y*
11.65%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*
4.23%
ALL TIME*
4.94%

AMZA

1D
0.65%
1M
5.94%
6M
21.61%
YTD
30.46%
1Y
23.26%
3Y*
22.79%
5Y*
22.88%
10Y*
5.46%
ALL TIME*
-0.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.66M$1.65M$1.75M
$4.26M$4.15M$4.38M

DIV vs. AMZA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIV
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
17.66%3.10%11.27%-1.73%-3.92%30.60%-22.85%14.50%-6.60%9.90%
AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF
30.46%0.17%30.90%23.35%33.20%51.22%-49.25%6.27%-26.78%-6.90%

Correlation

The correlation between DIV and AMZA is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

0.60

The correlation between DIV and AMZA shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DIV vs. AMZA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DIV
AMZA

Real Estate

21.3%

-

Energy

20.5%
99.8%

Industrials

12.1%
1.2%

Utilities

11.6%
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

10.8%

-

Basic Materials

6.2%

-

Communication Services

6.1%

-

Financial Services

4.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%

-

Healthcare

3.3%

-

Technology

-

-

Real Estate

DIV
21.3%
AMZA

-

Energy

DIV
20.5%
AMZA
99.8%

Industrials

DIV
12.1%
AMZA
1.2%

Utilities

DIV
11.6%
AMZA
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

DIV
10.8%
AMZA

-

Basic Materials

DIV
6.2%
AMZA

-

Communication Services

DIV
6.1%
AMZA

-

Financial Services

DIV
4.0%
AMZA

-

Consumer Cyclical

DIV
4.0%
AMZA

-

Healthcare

DIV
3.3%
AMZA

-

Technology

DIV

-

AMZA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIV vs. AMZA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DIV
DIV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

AMZA
AMZA Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
AMZA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZA Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZA Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DIV vs. AMZA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DIVAMZADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.21

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.93

1.85

+2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.48

4.51

+6.97

DIV vs. AMZA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the AMZA Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIV and AMZA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DIV vs. AMZA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIV drawdown since its inception was -52.74%, smaller than the maximum AMZA drawdown of -91.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIV and AMZA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVAMZADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.74%

-91.46%

+38.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.13%

-11.84%

+6.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.33%

-18.56%

+6.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.14%

-25.15%

+4.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.74%

-86.84%

+34.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.04%

-4.13%

+2.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.96%

-44.51%

+37.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

5.02%

-3.26%

Volatility

DIV vs. AMZA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) is 3.25%, while InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) has a volatility of 5.43%. This indicates that DIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVAMZADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

5.43%

-2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.73%

14.17%

-6.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.53%

18.20%

-7.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.69%

25.27%

-11.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.00%

37.14%

-19.14%

DIV vs. AMZA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZA's 2.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIV vs. AMZA - Dividend Comparison

DIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, less than AMZA's 7.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF
7.83%8.81%7.29%9.40%7.65%10.24%22.13%19.47%34.46%24.16%18.36%18.21%
DIV
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
6.54%7.30%5.74%7.13%6.62%5.24%8.01%7.65%7.08%5.92%6.78%8.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIV and AMZA have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMZA has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to DIV (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIV dropped -52.74% vs AMZA's -91.46%.

On 10-year performance, AMZA leads with 5.46% vs 4.23% for DIV. On fees, DIV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, AMZA has performed better with a 5.46% return vs 4.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 2.01% for AMZA.

AMZA has the higher dividend yield at 7.83%, compared with 6.54% for DIV.

DIV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while AMZA is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DIV and 2.01% for AMZA.

DIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIV and AMZA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer