DISV vs. FNK
DISV (Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF) and FNK (First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DISV is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while FNK is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Value Index. DISV is actively managed, while FNK is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DISV returned 24.35%/yr vs 13.11%/yr for FNK. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DISV charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FNK.
Performance
DISV vs. FNK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DISV achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly higher than FNK's 7.22% return.
DISV
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 3.34%
- YTD
- 10.83%
- 6M
- 15.28%
- 1Y
- 34.34%
- 3Y*
- 24.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNK
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 7.22%
- 6M
- 7.56%
- 1Y
- 19.55%
- 3Y*
- 13.11%
- 5Y*
- 6.97%
- 10Y*
- 9.29%
DISV vs. FNK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DISV Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF | 10.83% | 47.42% | 5.87% | 19.52% | -9.72% |
FNK First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 7.22% | 5.65% | 6.65% | 21.03% | -6.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between DISV and FNK is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2022 | 0.70 |
The correlation between DISV and FNK shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DISV vs. FNK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DISV
FNK
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Communication Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
Utilities
Financial Services
DISV
FNK
Basic Materials
DISV
FNK
Industrials
DISV
FNK
Consumer Cyclical
DISV
FNK
Energy
DISV
FNK
Consumer Defensive
DISV
FNK
Technology
DISV
FNK
Communication Services
DISV
FNK
Real Estate
DISV
FNK
Healthcare
DISV
FNK
Utilities
DISV
FNK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DISV vs. FNK — Risk / Return Rank
DISV
FNK
DISV vs. FNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) and First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DISV | FNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.39 | 1.29 | +1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.28 | 2.02 | +1.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.23 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | 2.15 | +0.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.27 | 6.23 | +4.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DISV | FNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 1.29 | +1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.40 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
DISV vs. FNK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DISV drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, smaller than the maximum FNK drawdown of -50.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DISV and FNK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DISV | FNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.77% | -50.70% | +23.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.69% | -9.13% | -3.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.15% | -25.16% | +11.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.48% | -2.16% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.90% | -6.84% | +1.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 3.15% | +0.20% |
Volatility
DISV vs. FNK - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK) at 3.53%. This indicates that DISV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DISV | FNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 3.53% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.69% | 9.69% | +2.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.45% | 15.36% | -0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 21.04% | -3.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 23.86% | -6.50% |
DISV vs. FNK - Expense Ratio Comparison
DISV has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than FNK's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
DISV vs. FNK - Dividend Comparison
DISV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, more than FNK's 1.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DISV Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF | 2.39% | 2.69% | 2.77% | 2.73% | 1.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNK First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 1.56% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.66% | 1.27% | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.76% | 1.40% | 1.38% | 1.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DISV and FNK have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DISV has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to FNK (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DISV dropped -26.77% vs FNK's -50.70%.
On 3-year performance, DISV leads with 24.35% vs 13.11% for FNK. On fees, DISV is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, FNK has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DISV has performed better with a 24.35% return vs 13.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DISV is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FNK.
DISV has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 1.56% for FNK.
DISV is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while FNK is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for DISV and 0.70% for FNK.
DISV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DISV and FNK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer