PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DISSX vs. DNLAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DISSX vs. DNLAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Smallcap Stock Index Fund (DISSX) and BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DISSX achieves a 16.16% return, which is significantly lower than DNLAX's 27.67% return. Over the past 10 years, DISSX has underperformed DNLAX with an annualized return of 10.07%, while DNLAX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.01% annualized return.


DISSX

1D
0.90%
1M
2.55%
YTD
16.16%
6M
14.84%
1Y
32.05%
3Y*
13.35%
5Y*
4.92%
10Y*
10.07%

DNLAX

1D
1.81%
1M
2.80%
YTD
27.67%
6M
30.04%
1Y
54.19%
3Y*
16.78%
5Y*
16.23%
10Y*
14.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DISSX vs. DNLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DISSX
BNY Mellon Smallcap Stock Index Fund
16.16%5.41%6.87%14.24%-16.71%26.41%10.92%22.28%-8.30%12.40%
DNLAX
BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A
27.67%14.75%0.86%1.33%33.83%38.00%6.30%16.33%-17.78%13.69%

Correlation

The correlation between DISSX and DNLAX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2003

0.68

The correlation between DISSX and DNLAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DISSX vs. DNLAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DISSX
DISSX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
DISSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DISSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
DISSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
DISSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DISSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

DNLAX
DNLAX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DNLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DNLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DISSX vs. DNLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Smallcap Stock Index Fund (DISSX) and BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DISSXDNLAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.96

3.08

-1.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.83

3.93

-1.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.51

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.93

7.45

-3.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.11

23.48

-10.37

DISSX vs. DNLAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DISSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is lower than the DNLAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DISSX and DNLAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DISSXDNLAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

3.08

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.64

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.55

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.37

+0.04

Drawdowns

DISSX vs. DNLAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DISSX drawdown since its inception was -58.30%, smaller than the maximum DNLAX drawdown of -69.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DISSX and DNLAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DISSXDNLAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.30%

-69.14%

+10.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.75%

-7.51%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.02%

-32.37%

+3.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.02%

-32.37%

+3.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.45%

-54.45%

+10.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

0.00%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.57%

-21.56%

+11.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.38%

+0.24%

Volatility

DISSX vs. DNLAX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Smallcap Stock Index Fund (DISSX) and BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX) have volatilities of 4.49% and 4.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DISSXDNLAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

4.59%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

13.48%

-1.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.58%

18.16%

-0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.49%

25.65%

-4.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.17%

25.50%

-2.33%

DISSX vs. DNLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DISSX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DNLAX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

DISSX vs. DNLAX - Dividend Comparison

DISSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.28%, more than DNLAX's 1.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DISSX
BNY Mellon Smallcap Stock Index Fund
13.28%15.42%14.79%8.20%13.87%10.72%7.61%8.35%13.18%7.40%6.49%11.30%
DNLAX
BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A
1.72%2.19%7.75%12.54%9.80%5.04%0.91%1.95%1.53%0.40%1.26%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


DISSX and DNLAX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DNLAX has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to DISSX (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DISSX dropped -58.30% vs DNLAX's -69.14%.

DNLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DISSX and DNLAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer