DISK vs. ITOL
DISK (Tema Memory ETF) and ITOL (Tema International Durable Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DISK is a Semiconductors fund actively managed by Tema, while ITOL is a Quality Factor fund actively managed by Tema. Both are actively managed. DISK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ITOL.
Performance
DISK vs. ITOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DISK
- 1D
- -9.86%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ITOL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -3.28%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
DISK Tema Memory ETF | $13.68M | $15.67M | $15.67M |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $1.87K |
DISK vs. ITOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DISK Tema Memory ETF | -30.68% |
ITOL Tema International Durable Quality ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DISK vs. ITOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Memory ETF (DISK) and Tema International Durable Quality ETF (ITOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DISK vs. ITOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DISK drawdown since its inception was -32.90%, which is greater than ITOL's maximum drawdown of -15.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DISK and ITOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DISK | ITOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.90% | -15.54% | -17.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.90% | -5.46% | -27.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.04% | -3.88% | -17.16% |
Volatility
DISK vs. ITOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DISK | ITOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 110.87% | 16.35% | +94.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 110.87% | 16.35% | +94.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 110.87% | 16.35% | +94.52% |
DISK vs. ITOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DISK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
DISK vs. ITOL - Dividend Comparison
DISK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ITOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DISK Tema Memory ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ITOL Tema International Durable Quality ETF | 0.13% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, ITOL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ITOL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DISK.
ITOL has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for DISK.
DISK is categorized as Semiconductors, while ITOL is Quality Factor. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DISK and 0.60% for ITOL.
Find the right allocation for DISK and ITOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer