PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIPS vs. NVDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIPS vs. NVDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) and T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIPS achieves a -8.73% return, which is significantly lower than NVDX's 17.35% return.


DIPS

1D
2.87%
1M
-6.32%
YTD
-8.73%
6M
-11.40%
1Y
-26.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDX

1D
-7.03%
1M
14.15%
YTD
17.35%
6M
23.60%
1Y
75.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIPS vs. NVDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DIPS
YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
-8.73%-31.46%-23.19%
NVDX
T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
17.35%26.24%14.31%

Correlation

The correlation between DIPS and NVDX is -0.96, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2024

-0.96

The correlation between DIPS and NVDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.96 to -0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIPS vs. NVDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIPS
DIPS Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
DIPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIPS Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
DIPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIPS Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDX
NVDX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
NVDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIPS vs. NVDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) and T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIPSNVDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.21

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

1.73

-2.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.36

3.91

-5.28

DIPS vs. NVDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIPS Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is lower than the NVDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIPS and NVDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIPSNVDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.96

1.11

-2.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.86

1.44

-2.30

Drawdowns

DIPS vs. NVDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIPS drawdown since its inception was -59.93%, smaller than the maximum NVDX drawdown of -68.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIPS and NVDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIPSNVDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.93%

-68.19%

+8.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.97%

-43.76%

+9.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.85%

-18.27%

-37.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.22%

-20.28%

-17.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.49%

19.27%

+0.22%

Volatility

DIPS vs. NVDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) is 10.68%, while T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) has a volatility of 24.68%. This indicates that DIPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIPSNVDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.68%

24.68%

-14.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.77%

50.88%

-30.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.88%

68.45%

-40.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.03%

95.58%

-57.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.03%

95.58%

-57.55%

DIPS vs. NVDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIPS has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIPS vs. NVDX - Dividend Comparison

DIPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 66.49%, more than NVDX's 2.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
DIPS
YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
66.49%96.20%24.18%
NVDX
T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
2.85%3.35%15.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIPS and NVDX have a correlation of -0.96, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDX has higher volatility (24.68%) compared to DIPS (10.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIPS dropped -59.93% vs NVDX's -68.19%.

On 1-year performance, NVDX leads with 75.17% vs -26.57% for DIPS. On fees, DIPS is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, DIPS has been the lower-risk option at 10.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVDX has performed better with a 75.17% return vs -26.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIPS is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NVDX.

DIPS has the higher dividend yield at 66.49%, compared with 2.85% for NVDX.

DIPS is categorized as Derivative Income, while NVDX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DIPS and 1.05% for NVDX.

NVDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIPS and NVDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer