DIPS vs. MSTY
DIPS (YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF) and MSTY (YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DIPS returned -26.57% vs -61.25% for MSTY. At a correlation of -0.36, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
DIPS vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIPS achieves a -8.73% return, which is significantly higher than MSTY's -14.73% return.
DIPS
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- -6.32%
- YTD
- -8.73%
- 6M
- -11.40%
- 1Y
- -26.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTY
- 1D
- -6.76%
- 1M
- -28.46%
- YTD
- -14.73%
- 6M
- -26.86%
- 1Y
- -61.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIPS vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DIPS YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF | -8.73% | -31.46% | -23.19% |
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | -14.73% | -42.71% | 47.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIPS and MSTY is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2024 | -0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIPS vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank
DIPS
MSTY
DIPS vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIPS | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 0.81 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | -0.86 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | -1.31 | -0.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIPS | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.96 | -1.02 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.86 | 0.26 | -1.12 |
Drawdowns
DIPS vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIPS drawdown since its inception was -59.93%, smaller than the maximum MSTY drawdown of -71.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIPS and MSTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIPS | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.93% | -71.79% | +11.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.97% | -71.79% | +37.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.85% | -66.48% | +10.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.22% | -26.09% | -12.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.49% | 46.87% | -27.38% |
Volatility
DIPS vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) is 10.68%, while YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a volatility of 17.01%. This indicates that DIPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIPS | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.68% | 17.01% | -6.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.77% | 48.79% | -28.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.88% | 60.44% | -32.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.03% | 71.92% | -33.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.03% | 71.92% | -33.89% |
DIPS vs. MSTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DIPS and MSTY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
DIPS vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison
DIPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 66.49%, less than MSTY's 269.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DIPS YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF | 66.49% | 96.20% | 24.18% |
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 269.45% | 294.61% | 104.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIPS and MSTY have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTY has higher volatility (17.01%) compared to DIPS (10.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIPS dropped -59.93% vs MSTY's -71.79%.
On 1-year performance, DIPS leads with -26.57% vs -61.25% for MSTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, DIPS has been the lower-risk option at 10.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DIPS has performed better with a -26.57% return vs -61.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIPS and MSTY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 269.45%, compared with 66.49% for DIPS.
DIPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.96 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIPS and MSTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer