DIPS vs. LQTI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DIPS (YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DIPS returned -26.57% vs 5.69% for LQTI. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. DIPS charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.

Performance

DIPS vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIPS achieves a -8.73% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's 0.16% return.

DIPS

• 1D: 2.87%
• 1M: -6.32%
• YTD: -8.73%
• 6M: -11.40%
• 1Y: -26.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LQTI

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 0.16%
• 6M: -0.04%
• 1Y: 5.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIPS vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DIPS YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF	-8.73%	-28.89%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	0.16%	6.69%

Correlation

The correlation between DIPS and LQTI is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025	-0.07

Return for Risk

DIPS vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIPS

DIPS Risk / Return Rank: 2
DIPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
DIPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
DIPS Omega Ratio Rank: 2
DIPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
DIPS Martin Ratio Rank: 2

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 32
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 29
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIPS vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DIPS	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.96	1.12	-2.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.28	1.64	-2.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	1.19	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.78	1.68	-2.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.36	5.15	-6.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DIPS vs. LQTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIPS Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is lower than the LQTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIPS and LQTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DIPS	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.96	1.12	-2.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.86	0.88	-1.74

Drawdowns

DIPS vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIPS drawdown since its inception was -59.93%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIPS and LQTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	DIPS	LQTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.93%	-3.41%	-56.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.97%	-3.41%	-30.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.85%	-1.44%	-54.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.22%	-0.88%	-37.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.49%	1.11%	+18.38%

Volatility

DIPS vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) has a higher volatility of 10.68% compared to FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) at 1.65%. This indicates that DIPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DIPS	LQTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.68%	1.65%	+9.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.77%	4.02%	+16.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.88%	5.10%	+22.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.03%	5.97%	+32.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.03%	5.97%	+32.06%

DIPS vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIPS has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

DIPS vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

DIPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 66.49%, more than LQTI's 9.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DIPS YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF	66.49%	96.20%	24.18%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	9.11%	7.01%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DIPS and LQTI in my portfolio?

DIPS and LQTI have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DIPS or LQTI?

DIPS has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to LQTI (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIPS dropped -59.93% vs LQTI's -3.41%.

Which ETF is better, DIPS or LQTI?

On 1-year performance, LQTI leads with 5.69% vs -26.57% for DIPS. On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, LQTI has been the lower-risk option at 1.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DIPS or LQTI?

Over the 1-year period, LQTI has performed better with a 5.69% return vs -26.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DIPS or LQTI?

LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for DIPS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DIPS or LQTI?

DIPS has the higher dividend yield at 66.49%, compared with 9.11% for LQTI.

What is the main difference between DIPS and LQTI?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DIPS and 0.65% for LQTI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LQTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.