DIPS vs. GPIX
DIPS (YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF) and GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DIPS returned -19.67% vs 20.92% for GPIX. At a correlation of -0.62, they often move in opposite directions. DIPS charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIX.
Performance
DIPS vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIPS achieves a -3.11% return, which is significantly lower than GPIX's 7.91% return.
DIPS
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 7.53%
- YTD
- -3.11%
- 6M
- -2.24%
- 1Y
- -19.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GPIX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- 7.91%
- 6M
- 6.94%
- 1Y
- 20.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIPS vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DIPS YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF | -3.11% | -31.46% | -22.13% |
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 7.91% | 16.25% | 7.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIPS and GPIX is -0.57, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | -0.62 |
The correlation between DIPS and GPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.62 to -0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIPS vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank
DIPS
GPIX
DIPS vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIPS | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.37 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 2.73 | -3.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.39 | 13.20 | -14.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIPS vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIPS drawdown since its inception was -59.93%, which is greater than GPIX's maximum drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIPS and GPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIPS | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.93% | -17.50% | -42.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.54% | -7.71% | -20.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.13% | -2.29% | -50.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.61% | -1.48% | -37.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.31% | 1.59% | +15.72% |
Volatility
DIPS vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) has a higher volatility of 9.79% compared to Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) at 4.24%. This indicates that DIPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIPS | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.79% | 4.24% | +5.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.67% | 8.71% | +12.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.80% | 10.79% | +18.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.91% | 13.88% | +24.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.91% | 13.88% | +24.03% |
DIPS vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIPS has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIPS vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison
DIPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 60.12%, more than GPIX's 8.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DIPS YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF | 60.12% | 96.20% | 24.18% | 0.00% |
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 8.14% | 8.01% | 7.45% | 1.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIPS and GPIX have a correlation of -0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIPS has higher volatility (9.79%) compared to GPIX (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIPS dropped -59.93% vs GPIX's -17.50%.
On 1-year performance, GPIX leads with 20.92% vs -19.67% for DIPS. On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, GPIX has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GPIX has performed better with a 20.92% return vs -19.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for DIPS.
DIPS has the higher dividend yield at 60.12%, compared with 8.14% for GPIX.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DIPS and 0.29% for GPIX.
GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIPS and GPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer