DINO vs. MU

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

DINO (HF Sinclair Corp) and MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. DINO operates in Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing (Energy), while MU operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, DINO returned 16.74%/yr vs 54.18%/yr for MU. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

DINO vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HF Sinclair Corp (DINO) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DINO achieves a 72.32% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 243.32% return. Over the past 10 years, DINO has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 16.74%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 54.18% annualized return.

DINO

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 11.69%
• 6M: 57.87%
• YTD: 72.32%
• 1Y: 79.30%
• 3Y*: 23.56%
• 5Y*: 23.80%
• 10Y*: 16.74%

MU

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: -1.65%
• 6M: 183.94%
• YTD: 243.32%
• 1Y: 687.66%
• 3Y*: 149.71%
• 5Y*: 66.39%
• 10Y*: 54.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DINO vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DINO HF Sinclair Corp	72.32%	38.14%	-34.36%	11.04%	61.94%	27.97%	-46.47%	1.94%	1.99%	63.28%
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	243.32%	240.24%	-0.96%	71.93%	-45.93%	24.21%	39.79%	69.49%	-22.84%	87.59%

Correlation

The correlation between DINO and MU is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1992	0.20

The correlation between DINO and MU shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.24 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap DINO : $14.07B MU : $1.11T
EPS DINO : $6.71 MU : $44.42
PE Ratio DINO : 11.63 MU : 22.05
PEG Ratio DINO : 0.11 MU : 0.08
PS Ratio DINO : 0.52 MU : 12.33
PB Ratio DINO : 1.46 MU : 11.10
Total Revenue (TTM) DINO : $27.62B MU : $90.27B
Gross Profit (TTM) DINO : $2.02B MU : $65.51B
EBITDA (TTM) DINO : $2.62B MU : $44.96B

Return for Risk

DINO vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DINO

DINO Risk / Return Rank: 90
DINO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
DINO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
DINO Omega Ratio Rank: 87
DINO Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
DINO Martin Ratio Rank: 92

MU

MU Risk / Return Rank: 99
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DINO vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HF Sinclair Corp (DINO) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DINO	MU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	9.29	-7.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	5.41	-2.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.69	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.35	23.23	-18.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.01	83.25	-72.25

DINO vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DINO Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is lower than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 9.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DINO and MU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DINO vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DINO drawdown since its inception was -85.99%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DINO and MU.

Drawdown Indicators

	DINO	MU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.99%	-98.25%	+12.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.57%	-30.28%	+12.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-57.35%	-57.63%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.35%	-57.63%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.35%	-57.63%	-19.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.70%	-19.29%	+18.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.97%	-58.07%	+30.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.98%	8.43%	-1.45%

Volatility

DINO vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HF Sinclair Corp (DINO) is 11.96%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 33.63%. This indicates that DINO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DINO	MU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.96%	33.63%	-21.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.64%	62.19%	-31.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.35%	75.68%	-38.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.71%	54.75%	-16.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.21%	50.65%	-6.44%

Dividends

DINO vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

DINO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, more than MU's 0.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DINO HF Sinclair Corp	2.56%	4.34%	5.71%	3.24%	2.31%	1.07%	5.42%	2.64%	2.58%	2.58%	4.03%	3.28%
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	0.05%	0.16%	0.55%	0.54%	0.89%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

DINO vs. MU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between HF Sinclair Corp and Micron Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

DINO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, HF Sinclair Corp reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 7.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.06B and revenue of 41.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.

DINO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, HF Sinclair Corp reported an operating income of 847.00M and revenue of 7.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

MU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.31B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 80.4%.

DINO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, HF Sinclair Corp reported a net income of 648.00M and revenue of 7.12B, resulting in a net margin of 9.1%.

MU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 28.24B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in a net margin of 68.1%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DINO and MU in my portfolio?

DINO and MU have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DINO or MU?

MU has higher volatility (33.63%) compared to DINO (11.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DINO dropped -85.99% vs MU's -98.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.29 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.