DINO vs. LLY
DINO (HF Sinclair Corp) and LLY (Eli Lilly and Company) are both stocks. DINO operates in Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing (Energy), while LLY operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, DINO returned 16.74%/yr vs 33.16%/yr for LLY. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DINO vs. LLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DINO achieves a 72.32% return, which is significantly higher than LLY's 10.97% return. Over the past 10 years, DINO has underperformed LLY with an annualized return of 16.74%, while LLY has yielded a comparatively higher 33.16% annualized return.
DINO
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 11.69%
- 6M
- 57.87%
- YTD
- 72.32%
- 1Y
- 79.30%
- 3Y*
- 23.56%
- 5Y*
- 23.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.74%
LLY
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- 6M
- 12.13%
- YTD
- 10.97%
- 1Y
- 50.94%
- 3Y*
- 40.33%
- 5Y*
- 39.60%
- 10Y*
- 33.16%
DINO vs. LLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DINO HF Sinclair Corp | 72.32% | 38.14% | -34.36% | 11.04% | 61.94% | 27.97% | -46.47% | 1.94% | 1.99% | 63.28% |
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 10.97% | 40.25% | 33.30% | 60.91% | 34.26% | 66.08% | 31.04% | 16.14% | 40.45% | 17.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between DINO and LLY is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1992 | 0.11 |
The correlation between DINO and LLY shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
DINO:
$14.07B
LLY:
$1.12T
DINO:
$6.71
LLY:
$28.16
DINO:
11.63
LLY:
42.21
DINO:
0.11
LLY:
0.85
DINO:
0.52
LLY:
14.77
DINO:
1.46
LLY:
34.13
DINO:
$27.62B
LLY:
$72.25B
DINO:
$2.02B
LLY:
$59.75B
DINO:
$2.62B
LLY:
$32.97B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DINO vs. LLY — Risk / Return Rank
DINO
LLY
DINO vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HF Sinclair Corp (DINO) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DINO | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.26 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.35 | 2.23 | +2.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.01 | 5.56 | +5.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DINO vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DINO drawdown since its inception was -85.99%, which is greater than LLY's maximum drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DINO and LLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DINO | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.99% | -68.24% | -17.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.57% | -23.18% | +5.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.35% | -34.48% | -22.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.35% | -34.48% | -22.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.35% | -34.48% | -42.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -3.80% | +3.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.97% | -19.19% | -8.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.98% | 9.27% | -2.29% |
Volatility
DINO vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison
HF Sinclair Corp (DINO) has a higher volatility of 11.96% compared to Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) at 9.93%. This indicates that DINO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DINO | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.96% | 9.93% | +2.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.64% | 27.64% | +3.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.35% | 38.71% | -1.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.71% | 32.51% | +6.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.21% | 30.30% | +13.91% |
Dividends
DINO vs. LLY - Dividend Comparison
DINO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, more than LLY's 0.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DINO HF Sinclair Corp | 2.56% | 4.34% | 5.71% | 3.24% | 2.31% | 1.07% | 5.42% | 2.64% | 2.58% | 2.58% | 4.03% | 3.28% |
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 0.54% | 0.56% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.07% | 1.23% | 1.75% | 1.96% | 1.94% | 2.46% | 2.77% | 2.37% |
Financials
DINO vs. LLY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between HF Sinclair Corp and Eli Lilly and Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DINO vs. LLY - Profitability Comparison
DINO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, HF Sinclair Corp reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 7.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LLY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a gross profit of 15.64B and revenue of 19.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.
DINO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, HF Sinclair Corp reported an operating income of 847.00M and revenue of 7.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.
LLY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported an operating income of 9.19B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.4%.
DINO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, HF Sinclair Corp reported a net income of 648.00M and revenue of 7.12B, resulting in a net margin of 9.1%.
LLY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a net income of 7.40B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in a net margin of 37.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DINO and LLY have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DINO has higher volatility (11.96%) compared to LLY (9.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DINO dropped -85.99% vs LLY's -68.24%.
DINO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DINO and LLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer