DIM vs. KEMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DIM (WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund) and KEMX (KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - DIM tracks the WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Index while KEMX tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DIM returned 8.04%/yr vs 13.52%/yr for KEMX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIM charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for KEMX.

Performance

DIM vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund (DIM) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIM achieves a 6.96% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 42.26% return.

DIM

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 0.84%
• YTD: 6.96%
• 6M: 9.54%
• 1Y: 20.14%
• 3Y*: 17.93%
• 5Y*: 8.04%
• 10Y*: 7.90%

KEMX

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: 13.02%
• YTD: 42.26%
• 6M: 47.92%
• 1Y: 79.97%
• 3Y*: 29.66%
• 5Y*: 13.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIM vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DIM WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund	6.96%	37.25%	3.51%	15.00%	-14.09%	9.55%	-0.40%	6.30%
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	42.26%	38.28%	0.36%	20.57%	-19.35%	10.55%	12.84%	7.93%

Correlation

The correlation between DIM and KEMX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2019	0.76

The correlation between DIM and KEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

DIM vs. KEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DIM	KEMX
Financial Services	25.0%	20.7%
Industrials	21.5%	8.6%
Real Estate	7.9%	1.2%
Consumer Cyclical	7.8%	5.4%
Utilities	7.6%	2.0%
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	3.0%
Basic Materials	5.6%	8.2%
Communication Services	5.5%	3.2%
Energy	5.2%	4.8%
Healthcare	3.8%	1.7%
Technology	3.7%	41.2%

Return for Risk

DIM vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIM

DIM Risk / Return Rank: 43
DIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
DIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
DIM Omega Ratio Rank: 43
DIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
DIM Martin Ratio Rank: 44

KEMX

KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 91
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIM vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund (DIM) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DIM	KEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	3.59	-2.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	4.31	-2.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.62	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	5.24	-3.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.26	20.86	-13.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DIM vs. KEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIM Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the KEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIM and KEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DIM	KEMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.56	3.59	-2.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	0.75	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.68	-0.38

Drawdowns

DIM vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIM drawdown since its inception was -61.45%, which is greater than KEMX's maximum drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIM and KEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DIM	KEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.45%	-38.80%	-22.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.56%	-15.36%	+4.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.13%	-19.62%	+7.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.71%	-30.85%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.59%	-1.31%	-2.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.63%	-8.86%	-3.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.78%	3.85%	-1.07%

Volatility

DIM vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund (DIM) is 4.20%, while KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that DIM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DIM	KEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.20%	9.86%	-5.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.71%	19.90%	-9.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.03%	22.40%	-9.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.43%	18.21%	-2.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.91%	20.94%	-4.03%

DIM vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIM has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

DIM vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison

DIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than KEMX's 2.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DIM WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund	2.85%	3.20%	3.58%	4.62%	3.96%	3.65%	2.53%	3.26%	3.28%	2.57%	2.94%	2.81%
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	2.31%	3.28%	3.39%	2.00%	4.10%	4.79%	1.69%	2.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DIM and KEMX in my portfolio?

DIM and KEMX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DIM or KEMX?

KEMX has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to DIM (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIM dropped -61.45% vs KEMX's -38.80%.

Which ETF is better, DIM or KEMX?

On 5-year performance, KEMX leads with 13.52% vs 8.04% for DIM. On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DIM has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DIM or KEMX?

Over the 5-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 13.52% return vs 8.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DIM or KEMX?

KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DIM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DIM or KEMX?

DIM has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 2.31% for KEMX.

What is the main difference between DIM and KEMX?

DIM tracks WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Index, while KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DIM and 0.25% for KEMX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.