DIM vs. CIL

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

DIM (WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund) and CIL (VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - DIM tracks the WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Index while CIL tracks the Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DIM returned 7.98%/yr vs 8.21%/yr for CIL. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIM charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CIL.

Performance

DIM vs. CIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund (DIM) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIM achieves a 7.79% return, which is significantly higher than CIL's 5.44% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DIM having a 7.98% annualized return and CIL not far ahead at 8.21%.

DIM

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 7.79%
• 6M: 10.77%
• 1Y: 20.07%
• 3Y*: 18.23%
• 5Y*: 8.43%
• 10Y*: 7.98%

CIL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.44%
• 6M: 8.27%
• 1Y: 16.20%
• 3Y*: 15.59%
• 5Y*: 7.45%
• 10Y*: 8.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIM vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DIM WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund	7.79%	37.25%	3.51%	15.00%	-14.09%	9.55%	-0.40%	19.85%	-15.32%	28.01%
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	5.44%	32.99%	3.76%	16.29%	-16.00%	11.07%	7.21%	19.13%	-13.34%	27.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DIM and CIL is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2015	0.73

The correlation between DIM and CIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.88 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DIM vs. CIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DIM	CIL
Financial Services	25.0%	24.8%
Industrials	21.5%	18.4%
Real Estate	7.9%	2.2%
Consumer Cyclical	7.8%	8.2%
Utilities	7.6%	6.6%
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	8.8%
Basic Materials	5.6%	6.6%
Communication Services	5.5%	5.8%
Energy	5.2%	4.6%
Healthcare	3.8%	7.7%
Technology	3.7%	6.4%

Return for Risk

DIM vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIM

DIM Risk / Return Rank: 43
DIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
DIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
DIM Omega Ratio Rank: 42
DIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
DIM Martin Ratio Rank: 46

CIL

CIL Risk / Return Rank: 73
CIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
CIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
CIL Omega Ratio Rank: 73
CIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
CIL Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIM vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund (DIM) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DIM	CIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	2.07	-0.52
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	2.96	-0.79
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.45	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.04	4.32	-2.28
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.75	18.62	-10.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DIM vs. CIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIM Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the CIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIM and CIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DIM	CIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.55	2.07	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	0.46	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	0.48	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.43	-0.13

Drawdowns

DIM vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIM drawdown since its inception was -61.45%, which is greater than CIL's maximum drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIM and CIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DIM	CIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.45%	-36.27%	-25.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.56%	-4.60%	-5.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.13%	-11.96%	-0.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.71%	-29.89%	-0.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.89%	-36.27%	-4.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.84%	-0.58%	-2.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.63%	-6.56%	-6.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.77%	1.07%	+1.70%

Volatility

DIM vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund (DIM) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) at 0.00%. This indicates that DIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DIM	CIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.39%	0.00%	+4.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.69%	4.42%	+6.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.05%	8.26%	+4.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.42%	16.49%	-1.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.91%	17.18%	-0.27%

DIM vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIM has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

DIM vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison

DIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than CIL's 1.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	1.67%	2.70%	3.46%	2.91%	2.41%	3.04%	1.73%	2.69%	2.85%	2.17%	2.34%	0.43%
DIM WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund	2.83%	3.20%	3.58%	4.62%	3.96%	3.65%	2.53%	3.26%	3.28%	2.57%	2.94%	2.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DIM and CIL in my portfolio?

DIM and CIL have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DIM or CIL?

DIM has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to CIL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIM dropped -61.45% vs CIL's -36.27%.

Which ETF is better, DIM or CIL?

On 10-year performance, CIL leads with 8.21% vs 7.98% for DIM. On fees, CIL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, CIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DIM or CIL?

Over the 10-year period, CIL has performed better with a 8.21% return vs 7.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DIM or CIL?

CIL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DIM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DIM or CIL?

DIM has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 1.67% for CIL.

What is the main difference between DIM and CIL?

DIM tracks WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Index, while CIL tracks Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DIM and 0.45% for CIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.